It seems maxPerHost could cause us not to fill each segment to topN even
when there are more than enough URLs for this job.
We should only count URLs we keep instead of all URLs considered.
There were also two variables named count which is probably bad form
(not a Java person, but it certainly
+1
Am 10.11.2005 um 19:03 schrieb Rod Taylor:
Generator.java.patch
---
company:http://www.media-style.com
forum:http://www.text-mining.org
blog:http://www.find23.net
Rod Taylor wrote:
It seems maxPerHost could cause us not to fill each segment to topN even
when there are more than enough URLs for this job.
We should only count URLs we keep instead of all URLs considered.
There were also two variables named count which is probably bad form
(not a Java