Re: svn commit: r411943 - in /lucene/nutch/trunk/lib: commons-logging-1.0.4.jar hadoop-0.2.1.jar hadoop-0.3.1.jar log4j-1.2.13.jar

2006-06-06 Thread Jérôme Charron
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411943view=rev Log: Updating to Hadoop release 0.3.1. Hadoop now uses Jakarta Commons Logging, configured for log4j by default. If log4j is now included in the core, we can remove the lib-log4j plugin. If no objection, I will doing it. Jérôme --

Re: svn commit: r411943 - in /lucene/nutch/trunk/lib: commons-logging-1.0.4.jar hadoop-0.2.1.jar hadoop-0.3.1.jar log4j-1.2.13.jar

2006-06-06 Thread Stefan Groschupf
As far I understand hadoop use commons logging. Should we switch to use commons logging as well? Am 06.06.2006 um 11:02 schrieb Jérôme Charron: URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411943view=rev Log: Updating to Hadoop release 0.3.1. Hadoop now uses Jakarta Commons Logging, configured

Re: svn commit: r411943 - in /lucene/nutch/trunk/lib: commons-logging-1.0.4.jar hadoop-0.2.1.jar hadoop-0.3.1.jar log4j-1.2.13.jar

2006-06-06 Thread Jérôme Charron
As far I understand hadoop use commons logging. Should we switch to use commons logging as well? Why not... (but using commons logging doesn't exclude to have a default implementation, such as log4j used by hadoop).

Re: svn commit: r411943 - in /lucene/nutch/trunk/lib: commons-logging-1.0.4.jar hadoop-0.2.1.jar hadoop-0.3.1.jar log4j-1.2.13.jar

2006-06-06 Thread Doug Cutting
Stefan Groschupf wrote: As far I understand hadoop use commons logging. Should we switch to use commons logging as well? +1 Doug