Re: Google performance bottlenecks ;-) (Re: Lucene performance bottlenecks)

2005-12-12 Thread Dawid Weiss
Hi Andrzej, This was a very interesting experiment -- thanks for sharing the results with us. The last range was the maximum in this case - Google wouldn't display any hit above 652 (which I find curious, too - because the total number of hits is, well, significantly higher - and Google

Re: Google performance bottlenecks ;-) (Re: Lucene performance bottlenecks)

2005-12-12 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Dawid Weiss wrote: Hi Andrzej, This was a very interesting experiment -- thanks for sharing the results with us. The last range was the maximum in this case - Google wouldn't display any hit above 652 (which I find curious, too - because the total number of hits is, well, significantly

Google performance bottlenecks ;-) (Re: Lucene performance bottlenecks)

2005-12-09 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Hi, I made an experiment with Google, to see if they use a similar approach. I find the results to be most interesting. I selected a query which is guaranteed to give large result sets, but is more complicated than a single term query: http com. The total number of hits (approx) is

Re: Google performance bottlenecks ;-) (Re: Lucene performance bottlenecks)

2005-12-09 Thread Jérôme Charron
The total number of hits (approx) is 2,780,000,000. BTW, I find it curious that the last 3 or 6 digits always seem to be zeros ... there's some clever guesstimation involved here. The fact that Google Suggest is able to return results so quickly would support this suspicion. For more