Hi,
On 8/16/06, Sami Siren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO to solve the main problem one does not need to set up another
project, just refactor and repackage.
I'd be happy either way, as long as I get a nice reusable library to
use in Jackrabbit. :-)
I think the key question on whether to bran
Chris Mattmann wrote:
However, the current Nutch software contains many "value-added" pieces of
code that are monolithically packaged together. If the services and
capabilities from the code were provided as separate, modular component
libraries, such services and capabilities could benefit many
Hmmm I guess the nutch-dev list doesn't like MS Word attachments. Here's the
content of the proposal, pasted in plain text:
Proposal for new Lucene Sub Project called "Tika"
Chris A. Mattmann, Jerome Charron
Overview
With its simple but efficient plugin system, Nutch is becoming more and mo
Hi Jukka,
Thanks for your email. Indeed, there was discussion on the Lucene PMC email
list, about the Tika project. It was decided by the powers that be to
discuss it more on the Nutch mailing list before moving forward with any
vote on making Tika a sub-project of Apache Lucene. With regards to
Hi,
There was recently discussion on perhaps starting a new Lucene
sub-project, named Tika, to create a general-purpose library from the
parser components and other features in Nutch that might interest a
wider audience. To keep things rolling we've created a temporary
staging area for the projec