RE: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by summaries?

2010-04-23 Thread Tim Redding
we use nutch on appears to be the only solution to this summary issue. Tim.. -Original Message- From: Julien Nioche [mailto:lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com] Sent: 22 April 2010 21:56 To: nutch-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by

Re: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by summaries?

2010-04-22 Thread Julien Nioche
[mailto:arkadi.kosmy...@csiro.au] > Sent: 21 April 2010 23:29 > To: nutch-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: RE: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by > summaries? > > Hi Tim, > > I would think that this parameter is related to the problem you > describ

RE: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by summaries?

2010-04-22 Thread Tim Redding
apache.org Subject: RE: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by summaries? Hi Tim, I would think that this parameter is related to the problem you describe, but the default value should allow indexing pages of the size you mention. Did you change this parameter? Regard

RE: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by summaries?

2010-04-21 Thread Arkadi.Kosmynin
m: Tim Redding [mailto:tim.redd...@tribalddb.co.uk] > Sent: Thursday, 22 April 2010 2:18 AM > To: nutch-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by > summaries? > > Hey, > > We have a long page that appears in the search r

Is there some arbitrary limit on content stored for use by summaries?

2010-04-21 Thread Tim Redding
Hey, We have a long page that appears in the search results but the summary never contains the search terms. Why is this? If we move the text containing the search terms up the page they get displayed in the summary so it's obviously related to some limit imposed somewhere. I've looked though