Re: Running ANT; was -- Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 1.1 Release Candidate #2

2010-04-26 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hi David, Thanks. In fact, running ant is probably simpler than running Nutch. The steps would be: * what OS are you on (Ant is available for all of them to my knowledge)? * if you need ant, grab a distro from ant.apache.org, otherwise, I'll assume that you've got ant installed and

Re: Running ANT; was -- Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 1.1 Release Candidate #2

2010-04-26 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
On 2010-04-26 16:24, David M. Cole wrote: At 10:55 PM -0700 4/25/10, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Most folks that use Nutch are likely familiar with running ant IMHO. I guess then I fall into the category of not most folks. Have been running Nutch for about 14 months and I haven't a clue

Re: Running ANT; was -- Re: [VOTE] Apache Nutch 1.1 Release Candidate #2

2010-04-26 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
Hey Andrzej, Actually, we don't have a build target (yet) that produces a binary-only distribution that we can ship and which you can run out of the box (not counting the build/nutch.job alone, because it needs the Hadoop infrastructure to run). I thought ant tar did this? That's what it sez