This is related to my early comment. The draft needs point out transport
related encapsulation and transport independent encapsulation. The
considerations for two types of encapsulations have difference.
To be able to support individual transport independent encapsulations, underlay
transport
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Lizhong Jin lizho@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the draft. I suggest to add one consideration: the generation of
entropy value.
1. When the node receive an UDP/TCP packet from the tenant, then entropy
value could be a hash value of 5-tuple.
2. When
Hi Tom,
See inline below.
Regards
Lizhong
-Original Message-
From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com]
Sent: 2015年4月9日 8:20
To: Lizhong Jin
Cc: Erik Nordmark; nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 12:02 AM, Lizhong Jin
On 4/7/15 12:02 AM, Lizhong Jin wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the draft. I suggest to add one consideration: the generation of
entropy value.
1. When the node receive an UDP/TCP packet from the tenant, then entropy
value could be a hash value of 5-tuple.
2. When the node receive an IP packet from
-Original Message-
From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:nordm...@acm.org]
Sent: 2015年4月9日 8:27
To: Lizhong Jin; nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
On 4/7/15 12:02 AM, Lizhong Jin wrote:
Hi Erik,
Thanks for the draft. I suggest to add one consideration: the
Hi Erik,
-Original Message-
From: Erik Nordmark [mailto:nordm...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 8:05 AM
To: Xuxiaohu; nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] Encapsulation considerations
On 4/7/15 7:15 PM, Xuxiaohu wrote:
Hi Erik,
As it has said in the draft : ... We
