Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

Hi Diego, Diego Garcia del Rio : On BGP-evpn we can use the tunnel-type extended community and add a new type specifically for vxlan-gpe. Given the backwards compatibility of vxlan gpe we can assume that a gpe capable end point should be capable of receiving "classic" vxlan. [...] I don't

Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

Comments inline Yours Irrespectively, John > -Original Message- > From: nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Diego Garcia del > Rio > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 10:02 PM > To: Larry Kreeger (kreeger) > Cc: Tom Herbert; Shahram Davari; Anoop Ghanwani; Sandeep Kumar >

Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

See inline below. From: nvo3 [mailto:nvo3-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Anoop Ghanwani Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 12:22 AM To: Larry Kreeger (kreeger) Cc: Sandeep Kumar (Sandeep) Relan; nvo3@ietf.org; Shahram Davari Subject: Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

> What we may want to say, then, is that if a P bit of 0 is used then none of > the other flags must be set. This would prevent someone from generating a > packet with a P bit of 0 and trying to use new GPE features. > > [Lucy] The P bit is used for version purpose too. The rule is if the GPE >

Re: [nvo3] RFC 7637 on NVGRE: Network Virtualization Using Generic Routing Encapsulation

FYI, NVGRE is published as an information RFC 7637. Your documents that reference NVGRE, please use this RFC number. Thanks Pankaj > To: ietf-announce at ietf.org, rfc-dist at rfc-editor.org > Subject: RFC 7637 on NVGRE: Network Virtualization Using Generic Routing > Encapsulation > From:

Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

Thanks for the references thomas! I was replying from my phone and had a hard time finding these. On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:24 AM, wrote: > Hi Diego, > > Diego Garcia del Rio : > >> On BGP-evpn we can use the tunnel-type extended community and add a >> new type

Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

On 9/24/15, 8:14 AM, "Lucy yong" wrote: > > >See inline below. > >-Original Message- >From: Tom Herbert [mailto:t...@herbertland.com] >Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 10:08 AM >To: Lucy yong >Cc: Anoop Ghanwani; Larry Kreeger (kreeger); Sandeep Kumar (Sandeep)

Re: [nvo3] destination UDP port : draft-ietf-nvo3-vxlan-gpe-00

Larry, On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Larry Kreeger (kreeger) wrote: > > > If I can restate what I think you two agree on, it is: If VXLAN evolves > independently from VXLAN GPE, then a VXLAN GPE endpoint that understands > only how to be backward compatible with RFC7348