On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Lizhong Jin wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I finally get the time to read your document. Yes,
> you are right for the Linux RFS implementation, where RFS is indexed with
> hash value. But for the NIC hardware accelerated RFS,
Hi Tom,
Sorry for the late reply, I finally get the time to read your document.
Yes, you are right for the Linux RFS implementation, where RFS is indexed
with hash value. But for the NIC hardware accelerated RFS, it is not the
case. The flow is indexed not by hash value, but 5/4/3/2-tuple exact