Hi Authors,
Transit device. A forwarding element along the path of the tunnel.
A transit device MAY be capable of understanding the Geneve frame
format but does not originate or terminate Geneve packets.
Could you give an example of such transit device? I do not call a firewall
device
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Lucy yong lucy.y...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi Authors,
“Transit device. A forwarding element along the path of the tunnel.
A transit device MAY be capable of understanding the Geneve frame
format but does not originate or terminate Geneve packets.”
Why does the header need to indicate how the packet is to be forwarded?
Since the packet is terminated, how to forward it or process it is an
otherwise local decision.
OAM would be better served to be expressed in an EtherType to eliminate
awkward semantics of the bit,
so then all geneve
Please see in-line below w/ [Lucy1]
-Original Message-
From: Tom Herbert [mailto:therb...@google.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 3:23 PM
To: Lucy yong
Cc: draft-gross-gen...@tools.ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nvo3] question and comment on gross-geneve draft
On Mon, Mar 10
Subject: Re: [nvo3] question and comment on gross-geneve draft
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Lucy yong lucy.y...@huawei.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tom Herbert [mailto:therb...@google.com]
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 2:29 PM
To: Lucy yong
Cc: draft-gross-gen
