Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-30 Thread Joe Touch
;, "farina...@gmail.com" <farina...@gmail.com> >> >> >> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team >> >> >> >> I get the similar understanding from Tom. But I am not confident with >> the timeline, hope will not be delayed

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-25 Thread Tom Herbert
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Fabio Maino wrote: > Hi Alia, > please see below. > > On 10/24/16 1:44 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > > Fabio, > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Fabio Maino wrote: >> >> >> I think it will be useful for the design team to

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-24 Thread Alia Atlas
Hi Fabio, On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:46 PM, Fabio Maino wrote: > Hi Alia, > please see below. > > On 10/24/16 1:44 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > > Fabio, > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Fabio Maino wrote: > >> >> I think it will be useful for the design team

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-24 Thread Anoop Ghanwani
Alia, I think it will provide an official reference which will be helpful since all the encaps will be around a long time and we can point people to that document when we are asked the question "why did they develop yet another encap?". Thanks, Anoop On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Alia Atlas

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-24 Thread Alia Atlas
Anoop & Fabiio, On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Anoop Ghanwani wrote: > Agree with Fabio (including the suggestion for an interim deliverable on > shortcomings). If the WG doesn't agree on the shortcomings, chances are > they may not like the 4th encap. > What do you

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-24 Thread Anoop Ghanwani
Agree with Fabio (including the suggestion for an interim deliverable on shortcomings). If the WG doesn't agree on the shortcomings, chances are they may not like the 4th encap. Anoop On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: > I agree with Fabio. > >

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-21 Thread Behcet Sarikaya
hang <nvo3-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Lizhong Jin > <lizho@gmail.com> > Date: Friday, 21 October 2016 at 07:04 > To: NVO3 <nvo3@ietf.org> > Cc: "fma...@cisco.com" <fma...@cisco.com>, Tom Herbert > <t...@herbertland.com>, "farina.

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-21 Thread Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)
t <t...@herbertland.com>, "farina...@gmail.com" <farina...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team I get the similar understanding from Tom. But I am not confident with the timeline, hope will not be delayed. Regards Lizhong -- Forwarded me

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-21 Thread Lizhong Jin
fma...@cisco.com>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org> > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 12:35:40 -0700 > Subject: Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I agree with Fa

Re: [nvo3] Update on encapsulation design team

2016-10-20 Thread Dino Farinacci
Tom, we'll see what the design team comes up with. Dino > On Oct 20, 2016, at 12:35 PM, Tom Herbert wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:10 PM, Dino Farinacci wrote: >> I agree with Fabio. >> >> Choosing a single encapsulation that is not 1 of the