> On Jul 29, 2016, at 6:02 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
> Anyway, I suppose we can agree that extensibility is a strong
> requirement, but we'll have to agree to disagree on what form
> extensibility should take and how much an encapsulation protocol
> should allow!
Yes, I think
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
>> On Jul 29, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>
>>> The only thing that I can say is that over the past several years since the
>>> protocol was defined our experience with this tradeoff has
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 5:16 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
>> The only thing that I can say is that over the past several years since the
>> protocol was defined our experience with this tradeoff has been pretty good.
>> Both the number of uses of Geneve and implementations
> The only thing that I can say is that over the past several years since the
> protocol was defined our experience with this tradeoff has been pretty good.
> Both the number of uses of Geneve and implementations have increased and as
> time has gone on, the uses have take more advantage of the
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>
>>> On Jul 29, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>>
As a hypothetical question, how would you handle a
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
>> On Jul 29, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>>
>>> As a hypothetical question, how would you handle a situation where the
>>> security token you have defined for GUE is shown to be broken and
> On Jul 29, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
>> As a hypothetical question, how would you handle a situation where the
>> security token you have defined for GUE is shown to be broken and needs to
>> be replaced with a new option? I’m sure that in that case, you
> As a hypothetical question, how would you handle a situation where the
> security token you have defined for GUE is shown to be broken and needs to be
> replaced with a new option? I’m sure that in that case, you would feel the
> need to react immediately. It seems like the two choices would
> On Jul 25, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
>> I object to GUE due to its inability to have a significant number of
>> extensions in a regular and interoperable way. The base flags structure is
>> limited (note 7 of 16 flags have already been used before the