Similar, in that for rails 5 or rails 6, many projects had a JS front-end -
Vue.js was pretty popular at one point, whilst react was very popular it felt
like overkill for many use cases.
I actually gave up on the front-end side, as the JS side was just changing all
the time, and it was too
Sorry - a bit of a long response below.
> Okay everyone ... this 'debate' got going on another thread I started.
>
> I've used React before and have found using Turbo frames and Stimulus to be
> like a breath of fresh air, especially how well they integrate with the rest
> of the Rails
Hi Daz,
I wanted to jump in actually move the question away a bit from "X vs Y" to
talk about some of the philosophy, and 2nd order consequences of such a
discussion.
Starting with philosophy, Rails is _heavily_ "convention over
configuration" driven, but it's a way of expressing that a bit part
