RE: Re: [nysbirds-l] "report" of heard-only warbler, 5/5

2010-05-05 Thread Tom Fiore
> On May 5, 2010, at 8:10 PM, david speiser wrote: I find it dubious to question anyone's sighting on any listserve and believe me I could almost daily!!! Those sort of comments are done best offline!! David Speiser NY, NY www.lilibirds.com X > Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 19:19:18

RE: [nysbirds-l] "report" of heard-only warbler, 5/5

2010-05-05 Thread david speiser
I find it dubious to question anyone's sighting on any listserve and believe me I could almost daily!!! Those sort of comments are done best offline!! David Speiser NY, NY www.lilibirds.com > Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 19:19:18 -0400 > Subject: Re: [nysbirds-l] "report"

Re: [nysbirds-l] "report" of heard-only warbler, 5/5

2010-05-05 Thread Phil Jeffrey
Note: Tom doesn't run that list and as far as I know isn't even a subscriber to ebirdsnyc. How Tom thinks anyone should sign their post to that list is irrelevant. Since I do run that list I encourage people to sign first names but I have no current intention of making it mandatory. In fact Matt

[nysbirds-l] "report" of heard-only warbler, 5/5

2010-05-05 Thread Tom Fiore
Re: the following report I'd offer at least cautionary notes: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ebirdsnyc/message/7678 1. This is a species whose song can be confused with a waterthrush song. 2. There are a lot of people with broadcast-capable portable/personal electronic devices, and instance