[nznog] NZNOG 2024 Post Conference Survey

. -- Nathan Ward for the NZNOG Trustees ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz

[nznog] NZNOG 2023 post-conference survey

. -- Nathan Ward for the NZNOG Trustees ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz

[nznog] NZNOG 2023 Programme

/programme https://www.nznog.org/conferences/nznog-2023/talks (If you are a speaker and would like your talk+bio on the talks page email ta...@nznog.org, operators are standing by) -- Nathan Ward For the NZNOG Trustees ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog

[nznog] Re: routing problem?

inue through, so let them run their course and see if you get hops after that. Probably also be worth hitting up your ISP, if that’s relevant, as it sounds like it’s an issue with them. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz

[nznog] NZNOG 2022 talks now online

t experience will be in person. We look forward to seeing you there! -- Nathan Ward for the NZNOG Trustees ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz

[nznog] NZNOG 2022 Registrations Now Open

details: https://list.waikato.ac.nz/hyperkitty/list/nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz/thread/EPA7YTWSBW3APPYYL636KO4LH4GRSEH7/ -- Nathan Ward [1] “Planned” - because COVID. All signs are pointing to the conference running on these dates. If not, we will postpone

[nznog] NZNOG 2022 - Tutorial Survey

for the Wednesday of the conference, and are keen to get some feedback so we can run the ones which are of the most interest. Can you please take about 22 seconds and give us some feedback here: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/8XYZJ9D Thanks! -- Nathan Ward

[nznog] problems with NTP on bigben?

ely! $ ntpdate -qu bigben.clix.net.nz server 203.167.224.60, stratum 0, offset 0.00, delay 0.0 3 Sep 14:30:03 ntpdate[26733]: no server suitable for synchronization found -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz

[nznog] Re: 103.68.122.0/24 is announced in Christchurch

Hi Don, I don’t think anybody really knows what you’re talking about. You’ve quoted a prefix claiming it’s in Christchurch. Whois and routing I can see shows it’s allocated to GPLHost and is advertised by their ASN (45887). Everything points toward Singapore location. It looks to me like

[nznog] Re: forward & reverse dns

hat’s reasonable, yep. Usually if it doesn’t, it’s an oversight rather than an explicit decision. Worth talking to the provider in question directly, and seeing if it can be improved. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.n

[nznog] Re: Moderated Membership?

rg> and give us as much as possible about who you are and who you work for and so on. Please make sure you read the CoC before asking: http://www.nznog.org/slack/slack-code-of-conduct <http://www.nznog.org/slack/slack-code-of-conduct> -- Nathan Ward _

[nznog] Re: NZ Working From Home Traffic Profile

urt Rodgers said the same on Twitter. I think the reality is that it’s the 6pm news. I see streaming video services drop sharply at 6, while social media stays relatively steady. You can’t watch Netflix and the news at the same time, but you can certainly sit on Facebook and Instagram while mum and dad

[nznog] Re: NZ Working From Home Traffic Profile

> On 30/03/2020, at 6:55 PM, Pieter De Wit wrote: > > Now if only there was something that could cast to multi’s…. This is NZ. If rugby wasn’t going to do, a university lecture sure isn’t. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list

[nznog] Chorus lab tour - Auckland - March 11

<https://www.eventbrite.co.nz/e/nznog-chorus-lab-tour-registration-95113580279> -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list -- nznog@list.waikato.ac.nz To unsubscribe send an email to nznog-le...@list.waikato.ac.nz

[nznog] NZNOG 2020 brought to you by Cisco

, InternetNZ, GoWireless, NZIX, Red Hat, Vocus, and Vodafone. Our sponsors make the NZNOG conference a reality and keep our prices low, so please check out our sponsors page for the full list, and make sure you thank them! -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG

[nznog] Re: Emergency Mobile Alert Nationwide Test 24th November

Oh! It’s not like you guys to get the time for these tests wrong..! > On 21/11/2019, at 12:40 PM, Damian Kissick [TSY] > wrote: > > Nooo! I meant SUNDAY 24th (cheers for heads up). > > I even had people check my e-mail! > > - Damian > > -Original Message- > From: Damian Kissick

Re: [nznog] 2019 BGP router recommendations

Yep and also don’t do full tables :-) > On 9/08/2019, at 2:21 PM, Phil Snowdon wrote: > > Seems like the consensus is still pretty much Juniper is the preferred vendor > of choice. I was prepared to be enlightened into a world of alternatives... > > Thanks all. Must be almost beer'o'clock >

Re: [nznog] 2019 BGP router recommendations

It’s vMX in a router-looking x86 box for people who think servers are for “PC Guys” and not for Real Networking. Just get vMX, get as many PSUs as you want. Get in pink or green. Whatever works. They let you pay on a subscription, you can upgrade past the 2x10G that MX150 limits you to, seems

Re: [nznog] 2019 BGP router recommendations

Hi, No, MX104 is very much not enough with full tables. Of course, you have you ask yourself if you *really* need full tables. If you have a couple of upstream providers, is that really necessary, or can you instead take a default and significantly cut your costs? There’s a handful of

Re: [nznog] Level 2, 220Q St circuit swap for management network?

s connect prices… What’s your company? -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

[nznog] NZNOG 2019 - About to get underway, incl. streaming link

outube, but the Youtube URI will change each session, so hit this each time and it’ll get you there. It’s on the website as well. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

Re: [nznog] NZNOG Slack

> On 10/01/2019, at 3:58 PM, Nathan Ward wrote: > > We’re using the free plan right now. We’ll see if we qualify for the > non-profit thing to get the extra features, but, not really important at the > minute. Free, it turns out, means we have a limit of 100 invites going o

[nznog] NZNOG Slack

until the conference, if you want on and the above don’t work, email me (nat...@nznog.org <mailto:nat...@nznog.org>) and tell me who you are and such, and I’ll invite you. -- Nathan Ward [1] Yes there are other “Free”, “Open”, etc. systems. Yes we could host our own system. The intent he

Re: [nznog] NZIX route server filtering (Was: Hurricane Electric joining APE)

> On 24/10/2018, at 11:33 PM, Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear Nathan, > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 11:18:34PM +1300, Nathan Ward wrote: >> I recall someone was looking at soft reloads, but I don’t know if that >> got implemented. I imagine current state (i.e. bogons and

Re: [nznog] NZIX route server filtering (Was: Hurricane Electric joining APE)

t got implemented. I imagine current state (i.e. bogons and a prefix limit) is where that got too. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

Re: [nznog] IPv6 / Cisco ASA / 2degrees UFB

Hi, You’re asking for an IA-NA here - a single IP, i.e. stateful IPv6. Do you have an IPv6 address from SLAAC? Can you show the contents of an RA message? You want to configure your DHCPv6 client to ask for IA-PD (a prefix). > On 6/10/2018, at 4:44 PM, Bill Walker wrote: > > It’s trying,

Re: [nznog] Comcom/Samknows broadband testing from a different perspective

sults. Can you get packet captures? Would be worth talking to the SamKnows people about this I am sure. I understand (though may be mistaken!) that their “speed” is a mix of various tests - some of which include international tests. -- Nathan Ward ___

Re: [nznog] Comcom/Samknows broadband testing from a different perspective

Hi Brian, You should call their support if you think there’s something going on that’s impacting your connection. They will detect if your connection is in use and doing more than (I think) 64kbit/s in the last 30s or something, and won’t run the tests. They have some clever stuff to detect

Re: [nznog] Hello Hurricane Electric, doubling the size of our domestic table?

er, months in advance. >> >> I don't believe HE had any malicious intent to break your internet. >> >> If your stuff broke because you have a shit upstream, fix it and move on. >> >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 16:35, Michael Fincham > <mailto:mich...@h

Re: [nznog] Affordable TICSA LI Solution and Support

SI compliant LI implementors in the world. How long before Fincham pops up saying “oh also there’s an OpenLI project you should look at”? Place your bets. Looking forward to laughing about this one over drinks tomorrow night. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mai

Re: [nznog] TICSA and lawful intercept

meta-data (who is talking to whom using which protocol and > transferring how much data) which I assume would help meet TICSA > requirements. No, TICSA compliance is not the nail for that hammer. Full packets are required, not flow data. -- Nathan Ward _

Re: [nznog] Network abuse

Hi, I don’t see it as operational, it’s a business thing. If we start having that sort of thing happen a lot it would be abused. Talk to Police if it’s illegal. Also, try CERT. I dunno if they’ll care about phone fraud - maybe though if it’s widespread etc. > On 23/03/2018, at 11:46 AM, Rudi

Re: [nznog] Spark/Vodafone peering

> On 12/12/2017, at 1:38 PM, Pete Mundy wrote: > > (unless anyone VF is on-list and could investigate?). I’ve prodded someone ___ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

Re: [nznog] Spark/Vodafone peering

hy do Spark and VFNZ appear to peer openly in Australia (and other economies) but not in NZ?”.. or something, it’s not really clear if “why” is the question to be honest. I think it was just trying to stir up a discussion. I don’t imagine it will, other than the usual scrappy providers that complai

Re: [nznog] Spark/Vodafone peering

ot rules. If it is painful for your customers to reach Spark/VFNZ, then you need to find out how you can reach those networks, and if the cost to do so is worth it to reduce that pain. There are a number of options for doing so. If you have a 50ms RTT to Sydney from Auckland, something is wron

Re: [nznog] BRAS Options

you do though, test the performance with your access provider - get some regulated UFB100 circuits from Chorus and make sure the scheduler resolution is good enough to drive it at the full speed - or make sure all your circuits are the modern ones. -- Nathan Ward __

Re: [nznog] BRAS Options

consequential, economic or other) however caused, whether by > negligence or otherwise, which may result directly or indirectly from this > communication or any files attached. > > > From: Nathan Ward [mailto:nz...@daork.net] > Sent: Friday, November 10, 2017 12:54 PM > To: Nathan Broo

Re: [nznog] BRAS Options

r virus checking procedures prior to use. Simtronic Technologies Pty > Ltd does NOT accept liability for any loss or damage (whether direct, > indirect, consequential, economic or other) however caused, whether by > negligence or otherwise, which may result directly or indirectly from t

Re: [nznog] BRAS Options

Don’t do that. Put customer routes in to BGP, use OSPF only to carry your loopbacks and router-router links for iBGP to use. Keep your OSPF small, and your BGP big - it’s what they’re both good at. (OSPF and ISIS are interchangeable here) > On 10/11/2017, at 2:45 PM, Nathan Brookfield >

Re: [nznog] Dialup over Ethernet

ing with another box ..or you forego fast failover times. Even with low DHCP timers you’re going to get 5 mins or so failover times if you lose a BNG. I prefer to use IPoE and deal with the above issues, as I agree, it’s better. Not everyone makes the same value judgement though, and that’s fi

Re: [nznog] TICSA and lawful intercept

hard on it. I’d like to write or use that code. The standards are open, so, if it is acceptable to agencies then it would be good to do. My understanding is that a lot of the vendor devices don’t work out of the box anyway and they need to do a bunch of dev. Why get someone else to do it? :-) -- Nat

Re: [nznog] TICSA and lawful intercept

Court scrutiny. Right - I wasn’t at that, but I’d heard the ETSI stuff was announced then. Streaming being required answers the question that I had! -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

Re: [nznog] TICSA and lawful intercept

> On 6/09/2017, at 2:33 PM, Dave Mill <d...@mill.net.nz> wrote: > > Hi again > > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Nathan Ward <nz...@daork.net > <mailto:nz...@daork.net>> wrote: > >> Perhaps some collaboration here would be useful, if oth

Re: [nznog] TICSA and lawful intercept

ng hardware - unless the LFCs and other last mile providers offer some sort of “LI service”, but if someone is or is thinking about writing some software or something then collaboration seems like a good idea. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

Re: [nznog] Reminder to update noc contact list/details

Hi, I think the intersection of networks who should be listed on a NOC list and networks but who don’t (and are unlikely to ever) peer is around 3, and of those networks I suspect that all of them already have relationships with their customers for issues. If you want your info to be

Re: [nznog] Reminder to update noc contact list/details

stuff in PeeringDB. I reckon we should make the NOC list refer to that, and note that the list itself may be outdated, and that PeeringDB is better. A local NOC list doesn’t give us any benefit. -- Nathan Ward ___ NZNOG mailing list NZNOG@list.waikato.ac.nz https://list.waikato.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/nznog

Re: [nznog] Citylink IX communication

Hi, Given the importance of RFCs in the community, I feel it is valuable to notify this communication from me to you to the entire list. I would note that the interpretation of RFC7947 in the following email (sorry for top posting) is in direct violation of RFC2119; 4. SHOULD NOT This