[nznog] IPv6 status?

Hi all, We've passed the 10th anniversary of World IPv6 Launch Day, but it doesn't seem like we've got very far? What happened to the Task Force? The site says it's archived, or is there a new one? Cheers, Richard ___ NZNOG mailing list --

[nznog] Re: routing problem?

On 11/05/22 20:46, Nathan Ward wrote: On 11/05/2022, at 8:06 PM, Richard Hector wrote: Hi all, Hopefully this is acceptable here ... I have a VPS (with a well-known NZ provider) which I can ping, but can't ssh to. tcptraceroute stops a couple of hops in (I think the first to not respond

[nznog] routing problem?

Hi all, Hopefully this is acceptable here ... I have a VPS (with a well-known NZ provider) which I can ping, but can't ssh to. tcptraceroute stops a couple of hops in (I think the first to not respond is our immediate ISP's immediate upstream). From a different house/ISP, I can connect

[nznog] Re: forward & reverse dns

On 5/11/20 7:15 pm, Jasper wrote: On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 06:33:42PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote: I'm not trying to host here (in this case). My mailserver is at a hosting provider, where all is good (barring the lack of IPv6 ...). It's when my home machine connects to my mailserver that I see

[nznog] Re: forward & reverse dns

, btw - unfortunately I'm not currently the customer, but the flatmate of the customer, so I don't get to pick :-( On 2020-11-05 18:00, Richard Hector wrote: Hmm. I expect low-touch, but given the reverse appears generated (.foo.isp.net.nz) or similar, the forward would also be generated to match

[nznog] Re: forward & reverse dns

, Richard Hector wrote: Hmm. I expect low-touch, but given the reverse appears generated (.foo.isp.net.nz) or similar, the forward would also be generated to match. And to host services (which I consider entirely reasonable for a home or any other user), I'd need a more useful dns setup than

[nznog] Re: forward & reverse dns

, at 5:30 PM, Richard Hector wrote: Hi all, Is it reasonable to expect that a residential ISP, that provides a generated reverse resolution to a home IP address, will also provide a matching forward resolution that goes back to the same IP? Cheers, Richard

[nznog] forward & reverse dns

Hi all, Is it reasonable to expect that a residential ISP, that provides a generated reverse resolution to a home IP address, will also provide a matching forward resolution that goes back to the same IP? Cheers, Richard ___ NZNOG mailing list --

[nznog] decent SOHO switches?

Hi all, I hope this isn't too far off topic. What's available in the way of managed switches (at least including 802.1q VLANs) at a suitable price for a small office? The (8-port) one I bought 4 years ago, even at the time the https ui didn't work, because browsers had stopped supporting old

Re: [nznog] DNS flag day - more info somewhere?

iginal Message ----- > From: "Richard Hector" > To: "nznog" > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2019 2:02:49 PM > Subject: [nznog] DNS flag day - more info somewhere? > > Hi all, > > I hope this is more or less on topic ... > > I've been testing my

Re: [nznog] ntp kod

On 11/05/18 10:56, Josh Simpson wrote: > Hi Richard, > > ntp2.ntp.net.nz currently has an GPS antenna > fault from the storm in Auckland a few weeks back and is currently > stratum 16, hence the messages. It was stratum 1 until earlier this week > (Rubidium oscillator),

[nznog] ntp kod

Hi all, I'm seeing lots of log messages like these: May 11 06:54:32 jet ntpd[2758]: receive: KoD packet from 2001:dce:2:17a::18 has inconsistent xmt/org/rec timestamps. Ignoring. ... on a home server. A quick web search suggests that KoD packets are a self-defence mechanism. Am I

Re: [nznog] IPv6 static addressing

On 17/03/18 15:36, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 17/03/2018 13:44, Richard Hector wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Apologies if this is a bit off-topic, but I know there's lots of IPv6 >> knowledge here :-) >> >> If I have an IPv6 ULA block (or several) > > Wh

[nznog] IPv6 static addressing

Hi all, Apologies if this is a bit off-topic, but I know there's lots of IPv6 knowledge here :-) If I have an IPv6 ULA block (or several) using SLAAC, and I want to additionally give out some static addresses in one or more of those blocks, am I right in thinking I can pick anything I like as

[nznog] Phish? Re: .NZ would like 5 minutes of your time

It's an email apparently from one party (NZRS), apparently sent by a second party (my registrar), via a third party (mscv.net) with a link to a fourth party (surveymonkey.com), which seems classic phishing. On the other hand it "looks quite legit". If it is legit, am I right in thinking it's a

Re: [nznog] Phish? Re: .NZ would like 5 minutes of your time

On 16/09/15 20:58, Sebastian Castro wrote: If it is legit, am I right in thinking it's a bad way to go about it? > >Any comments from participants? This is our first attempt to collect information this way, definitely this kind of point will be taken into account next time. Thanks Sebastian,

Re: [nznog] Can whois registrar info be wrong?

On 17/09/15 10:44, Jonathan Brewer wrote: On 17 September 2015 at 09:24, Richard Hector <rich...@walnut.gen.nz <mailto:rich...@walnut.gen.nz>> wrote: Is it technically possible for the registrar details in whois (for a .com domain) be out of date Yes. WHOIS hasn't b