Re: [nznog] Old Telstra Saturn Cable infrastructure in wellington.

Best not to be the NZ Comcast Phil ;) On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:31 PM Jamie Baddeley wrote: > Thanks Phil. > > I'd prefer VF put the solution in the public domain so when folks like me > ring up we don't end up thinking about big shoes and red noses. With the > age of the infrastructure I'd

Re: [nznog] Hello Hurricane Electric, doubling the size of our domestic table?

Don't forget that the NZ/AU concept of 'domestic table' is a fairly unique concept that isn't seen in much of the rest of the world- generally any feed is going to be default, a peering feed (customer routes), or a full table Doubt anyone thought of it ;). Congrats to Mike & Walt on extending

Re: [nznog] Citylink IX communication

reasonable that this is opt-in. I think the Citylink approach > here is reasonable, even if it doesn’t get everyone to where you want > immediately. Let’s work on lobbying those participants who have not opted > in, rather than flogging an almost-dead horse. I’ll help! > > > Cheers,

Re: [nznog] Drinks - Auckland CBD 14/2

I'll be your Valentine Steve... On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 4:51 PM, Steve Kurzeja wrote: > Cheers Fraser. No better way to celebrate Valentines day, say it with > beers! > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Fraser McGlinn < > fraser.mcgl...@anycast.com.au> wrote: > >> Hi

Re: [nznog] AS paths from NZIX route servers

Confirming - this will be to ask you to remove the ASN as the asking party receives the route, not for routes that the asking party is sending to the route servers? Also, will there be a time limit at which point all connections are forced to move to this new method, or will there be an

Re: [nznog] AS paths from NZIX route servers

f “no bgp enforce-first-as” on their > IX-facing edge router(s). Having the ability to still send the IX AS to > peers on a peer-by-peer basis might help stop those guys completely falling > off the AS > > Chris > > On 1 Aug 2016, at 3:29 PM, Tim Hoffman <t...@hoffman.net.nz&

Re: [nznog] 2Degrees (SNAP) issues at 220 Queen Street this morning

d the > flow of communication from NOC to customer has resumed in a satisfactory > manner. > > Thanks for your concern. > >> On 5 July 2016 at 13:22, Tim Hoffman <t...@hoffman.net.nz> wrote: >> I wasn't aware that this mailing list was the 2degrees NOC

Re: [nznog] 2Degrees (SNAP) issues at 220 Queen Street this morning

I wasn't aware that this mailing list was the 2degrees NOC email. On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Jesse Archer wrote: > We also noticed some issues. > > 2Degrees NOC are aware. > > > > > > *Jesse Archer* > *General Manager*Full Flavour > > > *p. *07 577 0099 *ddi*. 07

Re: [nznog] a routing loop??

Looks like your best bet might be to log a ticket with the GGI NOC before the list. Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 7, 2016, at 5:10 PM, Victor Zhong wrote: > > Thanks Tim, > > it's sourced from the University of Waikato (130.217.x.x/16) to 219.89.116.xx. > >> On 8

Re: [nznog] Who's breaking the APE?

Glad that we have a redundant IX with just as much normal traffic as APE :) On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Craig Whitmore wrote: > > -Original Message- > From: nznog-boun...@list.waikato.ac.nz > [mailto:nznog-boun...@list.waikato.ac.nz] On Behalf Of Liam Farr >

Re: [nznog] AKL-IX MDR Pop

Thanks Joe! Great to see that we have another strong option in NZ. Interesting also to see now that we have very equal traffic volumes between AKL-IX and APE (even outside the last time this was discussed where we had a major software release coming out of a CDN connected to AKL-IX if I recall

Re: [nznog] AKL-IX MDR Pop

html > > There’s a pretty consistent 2 to 2.5 Gbps on the WIX most days – and lets not > discount Wellington Tim - as you well know we have by far the best coffee ;) > > From: <nznog-boun...@list.waikato.ac.nz> on behalf of Tim Hoffman > <t...@hoffman.net.nz