Re: [nznog] Citylink IX communication

Disclaimer: I worked for CityLink a while back so feel free to consider the following biased or well informed as you see fit :) I think one aspect of this discussion that is often overlooked is who participates in the peering exchanges. It's not just a handful of large ISP's and content

Re: [nznog] Citylink IX communication

I'd also like to object to the blatant Citylink bashing on the list, it's not constructive and certainly not polite. While I completely respect the right for networks to disagree with Citylink's policies and move their peering elsewhere, I also notice that by far the majority of the complaining

Re: [nznog] Citylink IX communication

Generally speaking most of the internet lives in Auckland, being that thats where most of the content and our two international links live (for now). I work with other regional providers (not in Orkland) and apart from some local data for things like VPN’s and other on-net content like netlfix

Re: [nznog] Citylink IX communication

Maybe the Citylink product should just die a natural death... We have AKL-IX and Megaport now :) > On 27/02/2017, at 9:07 PM, Tim Price wrote: > > How does not opting in to this change negatively affect anyone but the people > who choose to abstain? (And their customers).

Re: [nznog] Citylink IX communication

How does not opting in to this change negatively affect anyone but the people who choose to abstain? (And their customers). The free market will surely sort this one out. I'm assuming that NZIX's standard deployment will be from now on sans-ix-asn-injection so standard attrition will eventually