Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16

2023-07-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 14.07.23, 07:39, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: MongoDB 5/6 support

2023-07-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Alexander On 07.07.23, 11:12, "Alexander Lüders" wrote: > we are using JackrabbitOak 1.42 that officially supports MongoDB 4.4.x. > Do you have MongoDB 5/6 support on your roadmap? Unfortunately we were > not able to find this information by ourselves on the site below. Automated builds

Re: Require OSGi R7

2023-07-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Konrad On 03.07.23, 13:27, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I would recommend to require at least OSGi R7 for Oak (released in 2018) > and at the same time no longer use the aggregate dependency but rather > the individual chapter dependencies of OSGi separately [3] which are > (from Compendium) >

Re: Moving to Oak 1.50 or newer

2023-05-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Jorge, On 16.05.23, 20:37, "Jorge Flórez" wrote: > we are planning to update our oak dependencies, from 1.12.0 to 1.50.0 > (or maybe 1.52.0). We are aware that we need to use Java 11 (already > using it) and update our Mongo servers. It seems it will be to version 6 > (not my decision). If I

Updated short url for oak-mongo.js

2023-04-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, Today I noticed the short url for oak-mongo.js [0] was still pointing to SVN [1]. I updated it to now redirect to git [2]. Regards Marcel [0] https://s.apache.org/oak-mongo.js [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/trunk/oak-run/src/main/js/oak-mongo.js [2]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.15

2023-04-04 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 04.04.23, 08:48, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.15. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.50.0

2023-03-20 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 18.03.23, 10:50, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.50.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

2022-12-18 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 16.12.22, 20:01, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > @Marcel: Are you still looking into optimizations? No, I’m not. Regards Marcel

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

2022-11-15 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 11.11.22, 15:11, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > I think it would be worthile to check if the build can be optimised FYI, I also changed the Job configuration to not build PRs in draft state. Regards Marcel

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

2022-11-15 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 14.11.22, 16:29, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Can you come up with a PR? See https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/755 Though, I don’t think the build it triggers actually uses the updated Jenkinsfile. Regards Marcel

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

2022-11-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 11.11.22, 15:11, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > I think it would be worthile to check if the build can be optimised, > otherwise Oak builds are blocking many execution slots of the Jenkins > ASF instance. I did notice one thing. Our PRs may schedule a build each time commits are pushed to

Re: Oak Jenkins build takes up too many resources

2022-11-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Robert, On 11.11.22, 15:11, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > I was waiting for a small PR of mine in Sling to be built by Jenkins and > I saw that it was not picked for some time. Looking at the executing > jobs I noticed that there were many, different, Oak stages being ran. > > A sample PR check

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.13

2022-10-13 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 13.10.22, 11:46, "Nitin Gupta" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.13. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: Removing a version does not remove associated labels

2022-08-30 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Arun, On 29.08.22, 09:05, "Arun Ram" wrote: > I have checked the classic jackrabbit . Here i dont see the problem. > In classic jackrabbit InternalVersionHistoryImpl[1] removes the > versionLabel before removing the version. > Also regarding ReferentialIntegrityException of removeVersion , it

Re: 180 open PRs on Github

2022-08-26 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 10.08.22, 12:30, "Stefan Seifert" wrote: > this sounds like a job that should be automated - e.g. using the stale > github action. +1 I’m also in favour of automating this task. Some of the PRs just need a nudge, but many can probably be closed because the issue is no longer that

Re: Removing a version does not remove associated labels

2022-08-25 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Arun, On 25.08.22, 13:20, "Arun Ram" wrote: > We have encountered a behavior of versionStorage and versionLabels which I > think is bug. > > *Current behavior:* > >1. Create a node and make it *versionable* >2. Now create more than two versions (for example two version is *1.0* >

Re: Bulk load [migration] to oak using RDB Document node store

2022-08-02 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Selvaraj, On 27.07.22, 10:31, "Selvaraj chennappan" wrote: > We are migrating to Apache jackrabbit oak . > RDB Document node store > Postgres > > oak 1.42.0 > java 8 > > issue : Loading is extremely slow (10x) when compared with Segment node > store . > Could you please suggest any

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

2022-07-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 22.07.22, 12:46, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I use this information to quickly check: > > - which is the latest release To me the displayed version is just confusing. Currently it says 1.43-SNAPSHOT. How do I know 1.44.0 is the latest release? Beware, it's a trap! ;) > - whether the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

2022-07-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 22.07.22, 12:18, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > The version Is part of the header contained in every page of the site, > so IMHO a release (i.e. version change) requires a republish. The version on those pages never matches the latest release. It's always just the current SNAPSHOT version.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

2022-07-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Konrad, On 21.07.22, 15:30, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Neither the website (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/index.html) > nor the published javadoc > (https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/apidocs/) have been updated > unfortunately. I did not make any changes to Oak pages. So I

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 released

2022-07-18 Thread Marcel Reutegger
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0

2022-07-15 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The vote passes as follows: +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Julian Reschke +1 Woonsan Ko +1 Angela Schreiber +1 Nitin Gupta Thanks for voting. I’ll push the release out. Regards Marcel

Re: Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.12

2022-07-15 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 15.07.22, 07:27, "Nitin Gupta" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.12. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 release plan

2022-07-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Konrad, On 12.07.22, 18:44, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Although I appreciate a release, I see that this has been done already > now. I would appreciate if you would give the Jackrabbit community a bit > more in advance notice (maybe one week) to allow others to contribute > fixes and also to

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0

2022-07-12 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 12.07.22, 17:16, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release thi

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0

2022-07-12 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.44.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/tree/jackrabbit-oak-1.44.0/ The SHA1 checksum of the

Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 release plan

2022-07-11 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, It’s been more than 6 month since the last Oak feature release. I’d like to release 1.44.0 after blocking issues have been resolved. Issues currently open for 1.44.0 are here:

Re: FileVault support for version storage

2022-04-28 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 27.04.22, 11:17, "Timothée Maret" wrote: > 1. Add support for merging versions into a version history which is > essentially OAK-1402 This is something different. VersionManager.merge() pulls in changes from corresponding nodes in a different workspace through a shared version history.

Re: OAK-9712: blob-cloud-azure instead of segment-azure?

2022-03-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 08.03.22, 15:55, "Matt Ryan" wrote: > - Open issues, questions, concerns, etc. in tickets and PRs must be > addressed satisfactorily before code is committed. I agree. To me it seems like changes for OAK-9712 were rushed in. The PR also had failed checks for most of the modules, because

New Jackrabbit Committer: José Andrés Cordero Benítez

2022-02-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, Please welcome José Andrés Cordero Benítez as a new committer and PMC member of the Apache Jackrabbit project. The Jackrabbit PMC recently decided to offer José committership based on his contributions. I'm happy to announce that he accepted the offer and that all the related administrative

Re: Javadocs

2022-02-01 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 31.01.22, 16:50, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > Can we publish the most recent release again? Apologies, I don't know why that happened. It looks like I was updating the website in November 2021 with some minor corrections and this also wiped Javadoc. I re-generated the site with Javadoc

Re: [jackrabbit-oak] branch upstream-trunk updated: [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration

2022-01-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 10.01.22, 09:23, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > Something went wrong at this step of the release. The following commit > updated the project version to 1.43-SNAPSHOT on branch 'upstream-trunk' > instead of 'trunk'. > > Trunk is still on 1.41-SNAPSHOT. Created

Re: [jackrabbit-oak] branch upstream-trunk updated: [maven-release-plugin] prepare for next development iteration

2022-01-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Miro, Something went wrong at this step of the release. The following commit updated the project version to 1.43-SNAPSHOT on branch 'upstream-trunk' instead of 'trunk'. Trunk is still on 1.41-SNAPSHOT. Regards Marcel On 06.01.22, 13:00, "miros...@apache.org" wrote: > > This is an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.42.0

2022-01-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 07.01.22, 13:04, "Miroslav Smiljanic" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.42.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: garbage collection with azure blob store

2021-11-19 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, Those lists are indeed a bit confusing. I added AzureDataStore below the DocumentNodeStore. Regards Marcel On 19.11.21, 10:55, "Marco Piovesana" wrote: > in the blob store page > under > the section "Blob Garbage Collection"

Re: garbage collection with azure blob store

2021-11-19 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 18.11.21, 11:18, "Marco Piovesana" wrote: > the documentation states that the blob garbage collection is not > applicable when using a document node store with an azure blob store, > while it is applicable when using a segment node store with an azure > blob store. So what happens to the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.22

2021-11-16 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 15.11.21, 14:44, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.22. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

2021-07-16 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 16.07.21, 11:20, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > You can always fall back to Jukka's release auditing guidelines Or better yet, the authoritative source [0]. Regards Marcel [0] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

2021-07-16 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 15.07.21, 18:35, "Angela Schreiber" wrote: > IMHO we should not vote on a release if everyone is requied to manually > alter the check-release.sh in order to verify that the checks are ok. It's unfortunate that GitHub's SVN export is unreliable and the release check script may fail. But

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

2021-07-15 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 15.07.21, 12:05, "Andrei Dulceanu" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. Checks OK after I did some manual changes to the

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Migrate to Git

2021-06-24 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Konrad, This is great news. Thanks a lot for volunteering and driving this forward. Regards Marcel On 23.06.21, 12:46, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > The repository has been successfully migrated and the patches and PR > were applied. Now the documentation should be up2date. For details refer

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Migrate to Git

2021-06-21 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Konrad On 18.06.21, 11:01, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I haven't received any feedback on the patches or the PR, I therefore > defer migration for one week. Please have a look at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9440 and the attached patches > and PR Thanks for preparing those

Re: User Feedback

2021-06-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Aaron, On 12.06.21, 18:54, "Aaron Anderson" wrote: > After completing my development there are a few very minor enhancements > for the Elasticsearch plugin that I would like to contribute to the > project. Should I create an issue first or may I directly create a > Github pull request? It's

Re: Patch: Small documentation imrovements

2021-06-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Aravindo, can you please create an OAK issue for component ‘doc’ and attach the patch there? Alternatively, you can also reference a GitHub PR in the issue. Thanks! Regards Marcel On 11.06.21, 20:48, "Aravindo Wingeier" wrote: > I did small improvements to the

Re: [VOTE] Migrate to Git

2021-05-25 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Konrad, On 19.05.21, 09:24, "Konrad Windszus" wrote: > I hereby propose to > > 1. migrate the SVN repository at > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/ to a Git repository > named "jackrabbit-oak" > 2. migrate GitHub SVN mirror at https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak > to

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7 released

2021-04-13 Thread Marcel Reutegger
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7

2021-04-13 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The vote passes as follows. +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Miroslav Smiljanic +1 Angela Schreiber +1 Julian Reschke +1 Woonsan Ko Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7

2021-04-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 09.04.21, 12:49, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release thi

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7

2021-04-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.22.7/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.22.7/ The SHA1 checksum

Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7 release plan

2021-04-08 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7 tomorrow. The list of open issues scheduled for 1.22.7 is empty. https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OAK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.22.7%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved The candidate release notes are here:

Re: Sending NODE_ADDED Events for Dynamic Resources / Nodes

2021-03-15 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Andy, Oak does not allow an application to generate such events. These events are the result of modifications on content stored in the repository. An EventListener on the repository will only get a NODE_ADDED event when a node has been added to the repository that matches the filter definition

Re: Mongo DB name max length

2021-02-05 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 03.02.21, 18:17, "jorgeeflorez" wrote: > My question is: is there another way to "create" the database having 64 > characters? or should I establish 63 (or maybe less) as the limit for db > names? You could try creating the database before starting Oak. Otherwise it may also be a flaw

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.6 released

2021-01-19 Thread Marcel Reutegger
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.6. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.6

2021-01-18 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The vote passes as follows. +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Julian Reschke +1 Miroslav Smiljanic +1 Woonsan Ko +1 Matt Ryan Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Marcel

Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.6 release plan

2021-01-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.6 tomorrow. The list of open issues scheduled for 1.22.6 is empty. https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20OAK%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.22.6%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved The candidate release notes are here:

Re: Having Problems to startup standalone with mongo

2020-09-28 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Ratna, it appears you need to add authentication to the MongoDB URI. In the log file you attached, reading from MongoDB fails with: 2020-09-25 23:10:01.079 ERROR 126802 --- [ main] o.apache.jackrabbit.oak-store-document :

Intent to backport OAK-9230 and OAK-9231

2020-09-25 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'd like to backport OAK-9230 and OAK-9231 to maintenance branches 1.22 and 1.8. This is an improvement disabled by default in oak-store-document and used by oak-run index selectively for reading nodes. Depending on the data in the DocumentStore, the speed up of the read operation can be

Intent to backport OAK-9229

2020-09-25 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'd like to backport OAK-9229 to maintenance branches 1.22 and 1.8. The changes are test only. See details in the issue description. I consider this low risk because no production code is touched. Let me know if you have any concerns. Regards Marcel

Intent to backport OAK-7553

2020-09-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'd like to backport changes for OAK-7553 to the 1.8 branch. The CommitValueResolver was introduced with 1.8 but slightly refactored with OAK-7553. This currently makes it more difficult to maintain the 1.8 branch. I consider the backport low risk because there is no functional change, just

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0 released

2020-09-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0

2020-09-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The vote passes as follows. +1 Julian Reschke +1 Woonsan Ko +1 Matt Ryan Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0

2020-09-08 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Julian, On 08.09.20, 08:05, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > ..., I now need relax the Windows firewall config, otherwise the Redis > server used in tests does not start. It would be good if we could avoid > that. Can you please create a JIRA issue for this? Regards Marcel

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0

2020-09-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.34.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.34.0/ The SHA1 checksum

Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0 release plan

2020-09-04 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.34.0 on Monday. The list of open issues scheduled for 1.34.0 is empty. I moved all issues scheduled for 1.34.0 and not in progress to 1.36.0.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0 released

2020-07-16 Thread Marcel Reutegger
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0. The release is available for download at: http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html See the full release notes below for details about this release: Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0

2020-07-16 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The vote passes as follows. +1 Marcel Reutegger +1 Woonsan Ko +1 Julian Reschke Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out. Regards Marcel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.4

2020-07-13 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 13.07.20, 13:04, "Nitin Gupta" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.4. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0

2020-07-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 10.07.20, 11:20, "Marcel Reutegger" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0. > The vote is open for the next 120 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release thi

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0

2020-07-10 Thread Marcel Reutegger
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.32.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.32.0/ The SHA1 checksum of

Re: [RT] Limited write support for non-default CompositeNodeStore mounts

2020-07-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 09.07.20, 15:39, "Robert Munteanu" wrote: > The details are rough and my memory of the implementation is not that > good Same here. Besides the problem with a potential two phase commit, I think the biggest concern was impact of a change in a mounted subtree on repository wide data

Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0 release plan

2020-07-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.32.0 tomorrow. The list of open issues scheduled for 1.32.0 is empty. I moved all issues scheduled for 1.32.0 and not in progress to 1.34.0.

Re: [Proposal] Feature toggles

2020-07-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 09.07.20, 10:13, "Julian Sedding" wrote: > I don't have a use case, but could imagine that introspection of the > state could be useful for reporting (e.g. a web-console report of all > active toggles and their state). I understand the desire to keep an API > minimal, but on the other

Re: [Proposal] Feature toggles

2020-07-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
I would probably rename FeatureToggle to Feature > and FeatureToggleAdapter to FeatureToggle. But that's of course a > matter of taste. Also, I would add an "isEnabled" method to > FeatureToggleAdapter, in order to allow the code setting the toggle to >

Re: [Proposal] Feature toggles

2020-07-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, Thanks for the feedback Julian. On 07.07.20, 10:45, "Julian Sedding" wrote: > I'm not sure about the aspect of the implementation, that FeatureToggle > is Closeable and probably often short-lived. Given that the > FeatureToggleAdapter is registered with the whiteboard, and thus likely >

[Proposal] Feature toggles

2020-07-06 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, There is a proposal ready in OAK-9132 [0] that introduces the concept of feature toggles [1]. A FeatureToggle is basically a boolean value that controls whether some new feature is available. The implementation uses the Oak Whiteboard to register a feature toggle. It is then up to another

Re: Intend to backport OAK-9065 to 1.8, 1.10, and 1.22

2020-06-05 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I don't have general concerns with the backport, but please note the 1.10 branch was retired on April 6th. See also https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/roadmap.html We shouldn't do any backports to that branch anymore. Regards Marcel On 05.06.20, 17:30, "Thomas Mueller" wrote: Hi,

[VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.30.0

2020-05-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.30.0 release is available at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.30.0/ The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.30.0/ The SHA1 checksum

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.28.0

2020-05-22 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The 72 hours vote period is not yet over. However, it seems unlikely the release will be approved given the feedback so far. I therefore decided to close the vote with the following results: +1 Woonsan Ko +1 Matt Ryan -1 Amit Jain -1 Julian Reschke -1 Andrei Dulceanu I will cancel the

Jackrabbit Oak 1.28.0 release plan

2020-05-18 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, I'm planning to cut Jackrabbit Oak 1.28.0 tomorrow. The list of open issues scheduled for 1.26.0 is empty. I moved all issues scheduled for 1.26.0 and not in progress to 1.30.0.

Re: sonarcloud.io for jackrabbit-oak

2020-05-18 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The following Sling wiki page describes the steps they did: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/SonarCloud+analysis Regards Marcel On 18.05.20, 11:11, "Aravindo Wingeier" wrote: Hi I noticed there is an apache account on sonarcloud [0], that is connected to the apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Oak 1.10 is retired, what does this mean for Jackrabbit 2.18?

2020-04-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, Sounds good to me. +1 Regards Marcel On 06.04.20, 11:07, "Julian Reschke" wrote: Hi there, so we just retired Oak's 1.10 branch, which has been replaced by Oak 1.22. Oak 1.22 uses Jackrabbit 2.20; Oak 1.10 was using Jackrabbit 2.18. No other Oak branch needs Jackrabbit 2.18. AFAIR,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.26.0

2020-03-23 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 20.03.20, 09:33, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.26.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.21

2020-03-23 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 18.03.20, 11:23, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > > That's a test problem I've seen as well; should go away if you run a > > local Mongo instance. Now the interesting question is why this hasn't > > surfaced before... > > > > Best regards, Julian > > Aha, it *is* a recent change, see OAK-8938.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2

2020-03-12 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 11.03.20, 09:25, "Nitin Gupta" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: Use of Observer vs ObservationManager for indexes?

2020-03-12 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 12.03.20, 00:04, "Matt Ryan" wrote: > Further digging revealed what I suspected - that the ObservationManager > approach actually uses an Observer registered with the whiteboard under > the covers. > > The question remains though - why the two approaches, and in specific > why are

Re: oak-osgi : lucene searching not working

2020-03-12 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Sandeep, In both scenarios you describe how a DocumentNodeStore instance is created. Your application must have more components than just a NodeStore implementation to get search working in Oak using Lucene. The NodeStore implementation itself does not provide any search functionality. Please

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.20

2020-01-30 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 28.01.20, 20:33, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.20. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [PROPOSAL] Branch 1.22.0

2020-01-29 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, This sounds good to me. It wasn't immediately clear to me why the branch would be from the 1.22.0 release instead of 1.24.0, but I think I understand now. One of the goals of the 1.22 branch would be to replace and retire the 1.10 branch, which means the releases from the 1.22 branch should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.19

2020-01-20 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 18.01.20, 13:25, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.19. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: Import problem

2020-01-19 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, The Guava method sameThreadExecutor() was removed in version 21 [0]. I assume there must be a more recent Guava version than 15 on your classpath. Regards Marcel [0] https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/Release21#commonutilconcurrent On 18.01.20, 22:22, "jorgeeflorez ." wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.25

2020-01-14 Thread Marcel Reutegger
On 14.01.20, 07:32, "Nitin Gupta" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.25. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.0

2020-01-13 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 13.01.20, 13:27, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: Regarding DocumentStore and BlobStore

2020-01-13 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 12.01.20, 15:40, "jorgeeflorez ." wrote: > If I use MongoDB as document store will I be able to set as blob store > one of the six available, right? Any blob store implementation can be configured in combination with the DocumentNodeStore on MongoDB. Though, for production use file or

Re: Deprecating API signatures referring to Guava in 1.10

2019-12-09 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 06.12.19, 14:07, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > once we do a stable release from trunk with the removal (say, 1.26), > there would be no officially supported Oak release which deprecates the > API. That is, 1.10.* (and earlier) would contain the old API (and not > deprecate it), 1.26.0 (and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.20.0

2019-11-20 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 20.11.19, 07:17, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.20.0. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.6

2019-11-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 07.11.19, 11:42, "Julian Reschke" wrote: > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.6. > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least three +1 Jackrabbit PMC votes are cast. All checks OK. +1 Release this package as Apache

Re: Disabling lease check for read repository

2019-10-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi Yogesh, On 04.10.19, 00:48, "yogesh upadhyay" wrote: > - what's the role of lease check if you are using Mysql. The lease check is part of the clusterId mechanism that gives each cluster node a unique id. This is not specific to the DocumentStore backend in use and is needed for any

Re: [DISCUSS] Impact of not updating last-modified time when writing a blob that already exists?

2019-10-02 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 02.10.19, 09:22, "Matt Ryan" wrote: > The question is: What would be the impact if we were unable to > update the last-modified time in this situation? I think the update is important for the datastore garbage collection to work correctly. There was an issue with the MongoBlobStore

Re: Repository data encryption

2019-09-30 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, On 27.09.19, 14:39, "jorgeeflorez ." wrote: > thank you for your reply. Yes, it seems pretty much impossible to do > that. Now I am trying something "simpler": I want to encrypt a file > before adding it to a node. I am able to do that, but I realize I will > lose text extraction because

Re: [DISCUSS] Branching and release: version numbers

2019-09-30 Thread Marcel Reutegger
Hi, In my view, using an odd numbered snapshot version would be better as well. According to versionatorr, OSGi will consider 1.20-SNAPSHOT more recent than 1.20.0. http://versionatorr.appspot.com/?a=1.20-SNAPSHOT=1.20.0 Regards Marcel On 27.09.19, 11:57, "Julian Reschke" wrote: On

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >