Re: New module oak-blob-cloud-azure?

Hi, Thanks!! As suggested would go for a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure. Regards Amit On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Angela Schreiber wrote: > Hi Amit > > In the light of discussions we had recently wrt modularisation, I would > also prefer to keep the new

Re: New module oak-blob-cloud-azure?

Hi Amit In the light of discussions we had recently wrt modularisation, I would also prefer to keep the new oak-blob-cloud-azure implementation in a separate module. Kind regards Angela On 15/03/17 10:29, "Amit Jain" wrote: >Hi Team, > >There is a new contribution for azure

Re: New module oak-blob-cloud-azure?

On 15/03/2017 09:29, Amit Jain wrote: > Hi Team, > > There is a new contribution for azure blob storage support - OAK-4933. > This introduces a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure. This certainly seems to > be the right approach from a separation and deployment standpoint. But in > terms of code the

Re: New module oak-blob-cloud-azure?

I tend to agree with Arek on this one. It feels a good logical division to have it separate, primarily so when updates to the Azure SDK are released, a new version of this module can be released without having to update oak-blob-cloud. By that same argument it may make sense at some point to do

Re: New module oak-blob-cloud-azure?

Hi Amit, On 15/03/2017, 10:29, "amit@gmail.com on behalf of Amit Jain" wrote: > Hi Team, > > There is a new contribution for azure blob storage support - OAK-4933. > This introduces a new module oak-blob-cloud-azure. This certainly seems to >