[jira] [Commented] (OAK-591) Improve KernelNodeStore cache efficiency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578292#comment-13578292 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-591: -- Meanwhile I thought about the MK again and how

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-591) Improve KernelNodeStore cache efficiency

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-591: - Attachment: mk-log-patched.txt mk-log-current.txt OAK-591.patch

[jira] [Created] (OAK-624) Run Oak-Jcr tests using the SegmentMK

Alex Parvulescu created OAK-624: --- Summary: Run Oak-Jcr tests using the SegmentMK Key: OAK-624 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-624 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Sub-task

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OAK-593) Segment-based MK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-593?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-593: Comment: was deleted (was: An interesting corner case for SegmentPropertyState#size A query that

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-624) Run Oak-Jcr tests using the SegmentMK

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578301#comment-13578301 ] Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-624: - Latest oak-jcr results: Failed tests:

[jira] [Assigned] (OAK-583) Inconsistencies in property index definitions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alex Parvulescu reassigned OAK-583: --- Assignee: Alex Parvulescu Inconsistencies in property index definitions

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-583) Inconsistencies in property index definitions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578326#comment-13578326 ] Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-583: - bq. IMO the property name implies that it is

[jira] [Created] (OAK-625) Ability to pass workspace name to a CommitHook

angela created OAK-625: -- Summary: Ability to pass workspace name to a CommitHook Key: OAK-625 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-625 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-606) Node becomes invalid after Session#move()

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578333#comment-13578333 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-606: --- At revision 1446141 I implemented Jukka's proposal

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-118) Implement workspace handling

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578356#comment-13578356 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-118: --- [As discussed |

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-583) Inconsistencies in property index definitions

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578360#comment-13578360 ] angela commented on OAK-583: i fixed the failures some time ago... it's just about having it

[jira] [Created] (OAK-626) Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree

angela created OAK-626: -- Summary: Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree Key: OAK-626 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-626) Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] angela updated OAK-626: --- Attachment: OAK-626.patch patch without test-cases... i can create those if we agree on how to do it.

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OAK-626) Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578448#comment-13578448 ] angela edited comment on OAK-626 at 2/14/13 4:05 PM: - patch without

[jira] [Created] (OAK-627) Move CommitHook(s) from KernelNodeStore to RootImpl

angela created OAK-627: -- Summary: Move CommitHook(s) from KernelNodeStore to RootImpl Key: OAK-627 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-627 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-625) Ability to pass workspace name to a CommitHook

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578544#comment-13578544 ] angela commented on OAK-625: added an initial draft in revision 1446289 that works with our

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-626) Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578584#comment-13578584 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-626: --- Patch looks good so far, I'd prefer a shorter method

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-626) Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578591#comment-13578591 ] angela commented on OAK-626: Something like setOrderable() or setOrderableChildren() yes...

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-627) Move CommitHook(s) from KernelNodeStore to RootImpl

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578624#comment-13578624 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-627: --- I had a quick look at this and the main issue is that

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-626) Allow for setting orderable child nodes on the parent tree

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-626?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-626: - Attachment: OAK-626.patch My preference is also setOrderableChildren(). I updated the patch with

[jira] [Reopened] (OAK-612) Calling addNode on a node that has orderable child nodes violates specification

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcel Reutegger reopened OAK-612: -- Reopening. Once the patch in OAK-626 is applied, oak-jcr should use the new method on the Tree

[jira] [Created] (OAK-628) Observer not called after Root.commit

Michael Dürig created OAK-628: - Summary: Observer not called after Root.commit Key: OAK-628 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-628 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-618) ChangeProcessor must ignore hidden properties

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-618?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13578658#comment-13578658 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-618: -- Fixed yet another place where check for hidden

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-628) Observer not called after Root.commit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13579016#comment-13579016 ] Jukka Zitting commented on OAK-628: --- Doesn't {{Root.commit}} in any case trigger a