[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598927#comment-16598927
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7709:
-
Updated complete patch: [^OAK-7709.diff] - [~mreutegg] please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-7709:
Attachment: OAK-7709.diff
> DocumentNodeStore dispose aborts when store was disposed due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-7709:
Attachment: (was: OAK-7709.diff)
> DocumentNodeStore dispose aborts when store was disposed due
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-7709:
Attachment: (was: OAK-7709-test.diff)
> DocumentNodeStore dispose aborts when store was disposed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598798#comment-16598798
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-7510:
---
trying to apply [~tmueller] idea, I ran into another bump.
It seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-7709:
Labels: candidate_oak_1_8 (was: )
> DocumentNodeStore dispose aborts when store was disposed due to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Mari updated OAK-7720:
Fix Version/s: 1.6.14
> Log hex dump of too big segments
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598758#comment-16598758
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-7720:
-
Backported to 1.6 at r1839760.
> Log hex dump of too big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598753#comment-16598753
]
Hudson commented on OAK-7726:
-
Previously failing build now is OK.
Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Mari updated OAK-7720:
Fix Version/s: 1.8.8
> Log hex dump of too big segments
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598707#comment-16598707
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-7720:
-
Backported to 1.8 at r1839758.
> Log hex dump of too big
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Mari resolved OAK-7720.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.9.9
Fixed at r1839746.
> Log hex dump of too big
Hudson created OAK-7726:
---
Summary: Build Jackrabbit Oak #1623 failed
Key: OAK-7726
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7726
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Tomek Rękawek created OAK-7725:
--
Summary: Allow to have the users and groups created in the
immutable part of the composite setup
Key: OAK-7725
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7725
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Mari updated OAK-7720:
Fix Version/s: 1.10
> Log hex dump of too big segments
>
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Jain resolved OAK-7724.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.9.9
Thanks for the review.
Fixed with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598526#comment-16598526
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7720:
LGTM.
Re. making that method safer: I was thinking to just wrap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598502#comment-16598502
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7721:
I looked how {{RecordWriters#newTemplateWriter}} could lead up to.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598499#comment-16598499
]
Tomek Rękawek commented on OAK-7724:
OK, so in the composite node store, even the global, mutable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dürig updated OAK-7721:
---
Attachment: OAK-7688-template-writer.patch
> Records of specific size bring SegmentBufferWriter#flush
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598493#comment-16598493
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7721:
bq. The dirty flag feels more natural to use
fair enough. But
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598489#comment-16598489
]
Tomek Rękawek commented on OAK-7724:
[~amitjain] - could you explain why we need to register the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598452#comment-16598452
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-7724:
-
[~amitjain], I think that the condition coincides to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Jain reassigned OAK-7724:
--
Assignee: Amit Jain
> BlobGCMbean not registered with SegmentNodeStoreFactory
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598446#comment-16598446
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-7724:
[~frm], [~tomek.rekawek], Could you please review the patch.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Jain updated OAK-7724:
---
Attachment: OAK-7724.patch
> BlobGCMbean not registered with SegmentNodeStoreFactory
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598445#comment-16598445
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7721:
{quote}The only two offending places I could find are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598442#comment-16598442
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-7721:
-
[~mduerig], in the second version of the patch the test fails if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Mari updated OAK-7721:
Attachment: OAK-7721-02.patch
> Records of specific size bring SegmentBufferWriter#flush to fail
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598430#comment-16598430
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-7721:
-
[~mduerig], {{SegmentBufferWriter#flush}} is an implementation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598419#comment-16598419
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-7720:
-
[~mduerig], in the second version of the patch I extract the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Francesco Mari updated OAK-7720:
Attachment: OAK-7720-02.patch
> Log hex dump of too big segments
>
Amit Jain created OAK-7724:
--
Summary: BlobGCMbean not registered with SegmentNodeStoreFactory
Key: OAK-7724
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7724
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598359#comment-16598359
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7721:
Patch looks mostly good to me.
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16598348#comment-16598348
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7720:
[~frm], I wouldn't worry about the verbosity. If we hit that code
35 matches
Mail list logo