angela created OAK-8065:
---
Summary: AbstractSecurityTest.getAccessControlManager: should use
getNamePathMapper() instead of DEFAULT
Key: OAK-8065
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8065
Project: Jack
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773773#comment-16773773
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8061:
-
bq. thanks Julian Reschke, but this was already
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773759#comment-16773759
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-8061:
---
thanks [~reschke], but this was already included in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773512#comment-16773512
]
Hudson commented on OAK-8064:
-
Previously failing build now is OK.
Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh updated OAK-8046:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.8.12
1.10.1
> Result items are not always correctly counted against
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773481#comment-16773481
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-8046:
Had to update test because aggregate lucene index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773377#comment-16773377
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8061:
-
I can reproduce the test failure.
It goes away
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773313#comment-16773313
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8061:
-
FWIW, the duplicate dependency originates from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773310#comment-16773310
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-237:
trunk: [r1784526|http://svn.apache.org/r1784526]
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh resolved OAK-8046.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.11.0
1.12
Resolved on trunk at [r1853969
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773223#comment-16773223
]
angela commented on OAK-8023:
-
[~stillalex], fine with me. i will send a mail to oak dev and ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773174#comment-16773174
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-8023:
---
[~anchela] can we backport this to 1.10?
> AccessCo
Hudson created OAK-8064:
---
Summary: Build Jackrabbit Oak #1960 failed
Key: OAK-8064
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8064
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Components: cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773118#comment-16773118
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8061:
-
I don't know what the difference to scope "tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrei Dulceanu updated OAK-8063:
-
Description:
The logic from {{StandbyClientSyncExecution#copySegmentHierarchyFromPrimary}}
has a f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrei Dulceanu updated OAK-8063:
-
Description:
The logic from {{StandbyClientSyncExecution#copySegmentHierarchyFromPrimary}}
has a f
Andrei Dulceanu created OAK-8063:
Summary: The cold standby client doesn't correctly handle backward
references
Key: OAK-8063
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8063
Project: Jackrabbit Oa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773060#comment-16773060
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-8061:
---
{{tests}} I think we said this is ok, the other one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16773056#comment-16773056
]
angela commented on OAK-8062:
-
[~stillalex], proposed patch (excluding tests) attached
> Princ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-8062:
Attachment: OAK-8062.patch
> PrincipalProvider: optional lookup of ItemBasedPrincipal by path
> -
angela created OAK-8062:
---
Summary: PrincipalProvider: optional lookup of ItemBasedPrincipal
by path
Key: OAK-8062
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8062
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-8058:
Labels: candidate_oak_1_6 (was: candidate_oak_1_8)
> RDB*Store: update Tomcat JDBC pool dependency t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16771725#comment-16771725
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-8058 at 2/20/19 12:41 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-8058:
Fix Version/s: 1.8.12
> RDB*Store: update Tomcat JDBC pool dependency to 8.5.38
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772964#comment-16772964
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7182:
--
That is an option indeed [~edivad]. I view it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772945#comment-16772945
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-8061:
-
Note:
{noformat}
oak-jcr/pom.xml
402- ${ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772930#comment-16772930
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-7182:
---
Shading may be actually the only solution to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772907#comment-16772907
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-8061:
---
it seems there are tests failing, I'm not sure why:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Deparvu updated OAK-8061:
--
Summary: Remove dependency on jackrabbit-core in oak-jcr tests (was:
Remove dependency on jackrabbit-cor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772905#comment-16772905
]
angela commented on OAK-8061:
-
[~stillalex], do ITs and TCK tests pass with the change? if yes,
Alex Deparvu created OAK-8061:
-
Summary: Remove dependency on jackrabbit-core in tests
Key: OAK-8061
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Improv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772887#comment-16772887
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-8061:
---
Just to clarify this is about oak-jcr depending on j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Deparvu updated OAK-8061:
--
Attachment: OAK-8061.patch
> Remove dependency on jackrabbit-core in tests
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16771725#comment-16771725
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-8058 at 2/20/19 10:35 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-8058:
Fix Version/s: 1.10.1
> RDB*Store: update Tomcat JDBC pool dependency to 8.5.38
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-8058:
Labels: candidate_oak_1_8 (was: candidate_oak_1_10)
> RDB*Store: update Tomcat JDBC pool dependency
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772845#comment-16772845
]
angela commented on OAK-8055:
-
[~stillalex], makes sense to me. +1
> Add conflict handler for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772838#comment-16772838
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7182:
--
{quote}Not that I disagree, but could you clar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772778#comment-16772778
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7182:
-
bq. I have come to strongly believe that any lea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16771801#comment-16771801
]
Julian Reschke edited comment on OAK-8059 at 2/20/19 8:41 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-8059:
Fix Version/s: 1.10.1
> Update Jackson dependency to 2.9.8
> --
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-8059:
Labels: candidate_oak_1_8 (was: candidate_oak_1_10)
> Update Jackson dependency to 2.9.8
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16772742#comment-16772742
]
Thomas Mueller commented on OAK-8046:
-
> resetted counter is technically incorrect in
43 matches
Mail list logo
