[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-07 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16465640#comment-16465640 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7479: -- Sure, so is not possible to have version-independent properties

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16465618#comment-16465618 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7479: --- I'd say that's a violation of the spec and should be fixed.

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-07 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16465567#comment-16465567 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7479: -- Hi Marcel, thanks for the clarification, but then I have

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16465554#comment-16465554 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7479: --- Oh, now I see the attached image. The node you created *is*

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-07 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16465553#comment-16465553 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7479: --- You are not creating {{mynode}} with an explicit node type.

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-7479) custom property does not respect type

2018-05-04 Thread Marco Piovesana (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7479?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16463834#comment-16463834 ] Marco Piovesana commented on OAK-7479: -- The issue seems similar to OAK-3621 that was closed in version