[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-494?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
angela resolved OAK-494. ------------------------ Resolution: Fixed hopefully found and fixed all bogus name comparison (jcr-jcr, jcr-oak, oak-jcr)... the additional interfaces implemented by ReadOnlyNodeTypeManager has been adjusted to explicitly state if oak or jcr name is expected. there one minor oddity left in ReadWriteNodeTypeManager#registerNodeTypes(Reader cnd) where the template name is compared against NT_BASE and - in case of empty super types - NT_BASE is added as declared super type... i wasn't totally sure if that one really needs a fix. > Cleanup ReadOnlyNodeTypeManager > ------------------------------- > > Key: OAK-494 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-494 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: angela > Assignee: angela > > while looking at different issues i found that we have some inconsistencies > and issues with the usage of jcr vs oak name in the node type plugin. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira