[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dirk Rudolph updated OAK-7109:
--
Attachment: facetsInMultipleRoots.patch
> rep:facet returns wrong results for complex queries
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dirk Rudolph updated OAK-7109:
--
Description:
eComplex queries in that case are queries, which are passed to lucene not
containing all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16301319#comment-16301319
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-7109:
bq. To workaround that the only solution that came to my mind is
Dirk Rudolph created OAK-7109:
-
Summary: rep:facet returns wrong results for complex queries
Key: OAK-7109
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dirk Rudolph updated OAK-7109:
--
Labels: facet (was: )
> rep:facet returns wrong results for complex queries
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16301325#comment-16301325
]
Dirk Rudolph commented on OAK-7109:
---
Yeah support of unions with facets doesn't work well, as facets are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dirk Rudolph updated OAK-7109:
--
Description:
eComplex queries in that case are queries, which are passed to lucene not
containing all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16301325#comment-16301325
]
Dirk Rudolph edited comment on OAK-7109 at 12/22/17 12:58 PM:
--
Yeah support of
Dirk Rudolph created OAK-7110:
-
Summary: Run rep:facet counting only once per lucene result
Key: OAK-7110
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7110
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16301390#comment-16301390
]
Dirk Rudolph commented on OAK-7078:
---
[~catholicon] any thought on that one? you can apply only the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16301325#comment-16301325
]
Dirk Rudolph edited comment on OAK-7109 at 12/22/17 12:43 PM:
--
Yeah support of
Andrei Dulceanu created OAK-7112:
Summary: Update documentation for cold standby
Key: OAK-7112
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7112
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16301325#comment-16301325
]
Dirk Rudolph edited comment on OAK-7109 at 12/22/17 12:55 PM:
--
Yeah support of
Robert Munteanu created OAK-7111:
Summary: Constraint violation message is imprecise when an
unexpected child node is found
Key: OAK-7111
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7111
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Munteanu resolved OAK-7111.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in [r1819044|https://svn.apache.org/r1819044]
> Constraint violation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh reassigned OAK-7078:
--
Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
> NullPointerException in FilteredSortedSetDocValuesFacetCounts during
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vikas Saurabh resolved OAK-7078.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.8
1.6.8
1.4.19
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16301777#comment-16301777
]
Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-7109:
[~diru],
bq. That basically works, but only in the case that both
18 matches
Mail list logo