[jira] [Created] (OAK-8381) Build Jackrabbit Oak #2193 failed
Hudson created OAK-8381: --- Summary: Build Jackrabbit Oak #2193 failed Key: OAK-8381 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8381 Project: Jackrabbit Oak Issue Type: Bug Components: continuous integration Reporter: Hudson No description is provided The build Jackrabbit Oak #2193 has failed. First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak #2193|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2193/] [console log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/2193/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6760) Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6760: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-blob-cloud to OSGi R6 annotations > - > > Key: OAK-6760 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6760 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: blob-cloud >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5463) Implement optimized MultiBinaryPropertyState.size(int)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5463:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Implement optimized MultiBinaryPropertyState.size(int)
> --
>
> Key: OAK-5463
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5463
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
>Reporter: Marcel Reutegger
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> {{MultiBinaryPropertyState}} currently does not have a {{size(int)}}
> implementation, which means the base class will convert the {{Blob}} into a
> String to get the size. This is inefficient and should have an optimized
> implementation in {{MultiBinaryPropertyState}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6619) Async indexer thread may get stuck in CopyOnWriteDirectory close method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6619:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Async indexer thread may get stuck in CopyOnWriteDirectory close method
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6619
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: status-threaddump-Sep-5.txt
>
>
> With copy-on-write mode enabled at times its seen that async index thread
> remain stuck in CopyOnWriteDirectory#close method
> {noformat}
> "async-index-update-async" prio=5 tid=0xb9e63 nid=0x timed_waiting
>java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING
> at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
> - waiting to lock <0x2504cd51> (a
> java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch$Sync) owned by "null" tid=0x-1
> at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:215)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1037)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.tryAcquireSharedNanos(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1328)
> at java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch.await(CountDownLatch.java:277)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.directory.CopyOnWriteDirectory.close(CopyOnWriteDirectory.java:221)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.writer.DefaultIndexWriter.updateSuggester(DefaultIndexWriter.java:177)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.writer.DefaultIndexWriter.close(DefaultIndexWriter.java:121)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorContext.closeWriter(LuceneIndexEditorContext.java:136)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditor.leave(LuceneIndexEditor.java:154)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.IndexUpdate.leave(IndexUpdate.java:357)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.VisibleEditor.leave(VisibleEditor.java:60)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.EditorDiff.process(EditorDiff.java:56)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.AsyncIndexUpdate.updateIndex(AsyncIndexUpdate.java:727)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.AsyncIndexUpdate.runWhenPermitted(AsyncIndexUpdate.java:572)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.AsyncIndexUpdate.run(AsyncIndexUpdate.java:431)
> - locked <0x3d542de5> (a
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.AsyncIndexUpdate)
> at
> org.apache.sling.commons.scheduler.impl.QuartzJobExecutor.execute(QuartzJobExecutor.java:245)
> at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:202)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> {noformat}
> The thread is waiting on a latch and no other thread is going to release the
> latch.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6062) Test failure: CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6062:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Test failure: CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration
>
>
> Key: OAK-6062
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6062
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration, documentmk
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
> Labels: CI, flaky-test, jenkins, test-failure
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Jenkins CI failure: https://builds.apache.org/view/J/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #146 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #146|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/146/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/146/console]
> The test failure is:
> {noformat}
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest
> validateMigration[Copy references, no blobstores defined, document ->
> segment-tar](org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest)
> Time elapsed: 2.534 sec <<< ERROR!
> javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Failed to copy content
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.prepare(CopyBinariesTest.java:183)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Branch with failed reset
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.prepare(CopyBinariesTest.java:183)
> Caused by: org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.api.CommitFailedException: OakOak0100:
> Branch reset failed
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.prepare(CopyBinariesTest.java:183)
> Caused by: org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentStoreException:
> Empty branch cannot be reset
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.prepare(CopyBinariesTest.java:183)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6947) Add package export versions for oak-store-spi
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6947: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Add package export versions for oak-store-spi > - > > Key: OAK-6947 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6947 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: store-spi >Reporter: angela >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > Attachments: OAK-6947.patch > > > [~mduerig], [~mreutegg], [~frm], [~stillalex], do you have any strong > preferences wrt to the packages we placed in the _oak-store-spi_ module? > Currently we explicitly export all packages and I think it would make sense > to enable the baseline plugin for these packages. > Any objection from your side? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6758) Convert oak-authorization-cug to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6758: -- Fix Version/s: 1.16.0 > Convert oak-authorization-cug to OSGi R6 annotations > > > Key: OAK-6758 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6758 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: authorization-cug >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.14.0, 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6515) Decouple indexing and upload to datastore
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6515: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Decouple indexing and upload to datastore > - > > Key: OAK-6515 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6515 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: indexing, lucene, query >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Currently the default async index delay is 5 seconds. Using a larger delay > (e.g. 15 seconds) reduces index related growth, however diffing is delayed 15 > seconds, which can reduce indexing performance. > One option (which might require bigger changes) is to index every 5 seconds, > and store the index every 5 seconds in the local directory, but only write to > the datastore / nodestore every 3rd time (that is, every 15 seconds). > So that other cluster nodes will only see the index update every 15 seconds. > The diffing is done every 5 seconds, and the local index could be used every > 5 or every 15 seconds. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3141) Oak should warn when too many ordered child nodes
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-3141: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Oak should warn when too many ordered child nodes > - > > Key: OAK-3141 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3141 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Affects Versions: 1.0.16 >Reporter: Jörg Hoh >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > When working with the RDBMK we came into situations, that large documents did > not fit into the provided db columns, there was an overflow, which caused oak > not to persist the change. We fixed it by increasing the size of the column. > But it would be nice if Oak could warn if a document exceeds a certain size > (for example 2 megabytes); because this warning indicates, that on a JCR > level there might be a problematic situation, for example: > * ordered node with a large list of childnodes > * or longstanding sessions with lots of changes, which accumulate to large > documents. > It's certainly nice to know if there's a node/document with such a problem, > before the exceptions actually happens and an operation breaks. > This message should be a warning, and should contain the JCR path of the node > plus the current size. To avoid that this message is overseen, it would be > good if it is written everyonce in a while (every 10 minutes?) if this > condition persists. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6597) rep:excerpt not working for content indexed by aggregation in lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6597:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> rep:excerpt not working for content indexed by aggregation in lucene
>
>
> Key: OAK-6597
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6597
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lucene
>Affects Versions: 1.6.1, 1.7.6, 1.8.0
>Reporter: Dirk Rudolph
>Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Labels: excerpt
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: excerpt-with-aggregation-test.patch
>
>
> I mentioned that properties that got indexed due to an aggregation are not
> considered for excerpts (highlighting) as they are not indexed as stored
> fields.
> See the attached patch that implements a test for excerpts in
> {{LuceneIndexAggregationTest2}}.
> It creates the following structure:
> {code}
> /content/foo [test:Page]
> + bar (String)
> - jcr:content [test:PageContent]
> + bar (String)
> {code}
> where both strings (the _bar_ property at _foo_ and the _bar_ property at
> _jcr:content_) contain different text.
> Afterwards it queries for 2 terms ("tinc*" and "aliq*") that either exist in
> _/content/foo/bar_ or _/content/foo/jcr:content/bar_ but not in both. For the
> former one the excerpt is properly provided for the later one it isn't.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7254) Indexes with excludedPaths, or includedPaths should not be picked for queries without path
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7254:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Indexes with excludedPaths, or includedPaths should not be picked for queries
> without path
> --
>
> Key: OAK-7254
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7254
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene, query
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Queries that don't have a clear path restriction should not use indexes that
> have excludedPaths or includedPaths set, except in some exceptional cases (to
> be defined).
> For example, if a query doesn't have a path restriction, say:
> {noformat}
> /jcr:root//element(*, nt:base)[@status='RUNNING']
> {noformat}
> Then an index that has excludedPaths set (for example to /etc) shouldn't be
> used, at least not if a different index is available. Currently it is used
> currently, actually in _favor_ of another index, if the property "status" is
> commonly used in /etc. Because of that, the index that doesn't have
> excludedPath has a higher cost (as it indexes the property "status" in /etc,
> and so has more entries for "status", than the index that doesn't index /etc).
> The same for includedPaths, in case queryPaths isn't set to the same value(s).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3809) Test failure: FacetTest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3809?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-3809:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Test failure: FacetTest
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-3809
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3809
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: solr
> Environment:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/
>Reporter: Michael Dürig
>Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
>Priority: Major
> Labels: ci, jenkins, test, test-failure
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.FacetTest}} keeps failing on Jenkins:
> {noformat}
> testFacetRetrievalMV(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.FacetTest) Time
> elapsed: 5.927 sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected: (2), aem (1), apache (1), cosmetics (1), furniture (1)], tags:[repository
> (2), software (2), aem (1), apache (1), cosmetics (1), furniture (1)],
> tags:[repository (2), software (2), aem (1), apache (1), cosmetics (1),
> furniture (1)], tags:[repository (2), software (2), aem (1), apache (1),
> cosmetics (1), furniture (1)]]> but was:
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:100)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:107)
> at junit.framework.TestCase.assertEquals(TestCase.java:269)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.FacetTest.testFacetRetrievalMV(FacetTest.java:80)
> {noformat}
> Failure seen at builds: 628, 629, 630, 633, 634, 636, 642, 643, 644, 645,
> 648, 651, 656, 659, 660, 663, 666
> See e.g.
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/634/#showFailuresLink
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5506) reject item names with unpaired surrogates early
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5506:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> reject item names with unpaired surrogates early
>
>
> Key: OAK-5506
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: core, jcr, segment-tar
>Affects Versions: 1.5.18
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: resilience
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-5506-01.patch, OAK-5506-02.patch, OAK-5506-4.diff,
> OAK-5506-bench.diff, OAK-5506-jcr-level.diff, OAK-5506-name-conversion.diff,
> OAK-5506-segment.diff, OAK-5506-segment2.diff, OAK-5506-segment3.diff,
> OAK-5506.diff, ValidNamesTest.java
>
>
> Apparently, the following node name is accepted:
>{{"foo\ud800"}}
> but a subsequent {{getPath()}} call fails:
> {noformat}
> javax.jcr.InvalidItemStateException: This item [/test_node/foo?] does not
> exist anymore
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.ItemDelegate.checkAlive(ItemDelegate.java:86)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.operation.ItemOperation.checkPreconditions(ItemOperation.java:34)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.prePerform(SessionDelegate.java:615)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.delegate.SessionDelegate.perform(SessionDelegate.java:205)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl.perform(ItemImpl.java:112)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl.getPath(ItemImpl.java:140)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.NodeImpl.getPath(NodeImpl.java:106)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ValidNamesTest.nameTest(ValidNamesTest.java:271)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.ValidNamesTest.testUnpairedSurrogate(ValidNamesTest.java:259)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source){noformat}
> (test case follows)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5990) Add properties filtering support to OakEventFilter
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5990: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Add properties filtering support to OakEventFilter > -- > > Key: OAK-5990 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5990 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: jcr >Affects Versions: 1.6.1 >Reporter: Stefan Egli >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > SLING-6164 introduced a _property name hint_ which, when set, allows to limit > the observation events to only include those that affect at least one of the > those properties listed. The advantage is to be further able to reduce the > events sent out. This feature has not yet been implemented on the oak side. > Thus we should add this to the OakEventFilter. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6769) Convert oak-search-mt to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6769: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-search-mt to OSGi R6 annotations > > > Key: OAK-6769 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6769 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4498) Introduce lower limit for gc() maxRevisionAge
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-4498: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Introduce lower limit for gc() maxRevisionAge > - > > Key: OAK-4498 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4498 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core, documentmk >Reporter: Marcel Reutegger >Assignee: Marcel Reutegger >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Introduce and enforce a lower limit for maxRevisionAge in > VersionGarbageCollector.gc(). > OAK-4494 changes the way documents in a cache are considered up-to-date. In > addition to the modCount value it also considers the modified timestamp. To > work properly, a new document must have a modified timestamp that is > different from a previous incarnation (i.e. before gc removed it). The > version GC should therefore not remove documents with a maxRevisionAge less > than the modified resolution (5 seconds). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3373) Observers dont survive store restart (was: LuceneIndexProvider: java.lang.IllegalStateException: open)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-3373:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Observers dont survive store restart (was: LuceneIndexProvider:
> java.lang.IllegalStateException: open)
> --
>
> Key: OAK-3373
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3373
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
>Affects Versions: 1.3.5
>Reporter: Stefan Egli
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> The following exception occurs when stopping, then immediately re-starting
> the oak-core bundle (which was done as part of testing for OAK-3250 - but can
> be reproduced independently). It's not clear what the consequences are
> though..
> {code}08.09.2015 14:20:26.960 *ERROR* [oak-lucene-0]
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProvider Uncaught
> exception in
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProvider@3a4a6c5c
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentStoreException: Error
> occurred while fetching children for path /oak:index/authorizables
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentStoreException.convert(DocumentStoreException.java:48)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeStore.getChildren(DocumentNodeStore.java:902)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeStore.getChildNodes(DocumentNodeStore.java:1082)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState.getChildNodeEntries(DocumentNodeState.java:508)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState.access$100(DocumentNodeState.java:65)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState$ChildNodeEntryIterator.fetchMore(DocumentNodeState.java:716)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState$ChildNodeEntryIterator.(DocumentNodeState.java:681)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState$1.iterator(DocumentNodeState.java:289)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.state.AbstractNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(AbstractNodeState.java:129)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.state.AbstractNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(AbstractNodeState.java:303)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(DocumentNodeState.java:359)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.EditorDiff.childNodeChanged(EditorDiff.java:148)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.state.AbstractNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(AbstractNodeState.java:140)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.state.AbstractNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(AbstractNodeState.java:303)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(DocumentNodeState.java:359)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.EditorDiff.childNodeChanged(EditorDiff.java:148)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.state.AbstractNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(AbstractNodeState.java:140)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.state.AbstractNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(AbstractNodeState.java:303)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeState.compareAgainstBaseState(DocumentNodeState.java:359)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.EditorDiff.process(EditorDiff.java:52)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.IndexTracker.update(IndexTracker.java:108)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexProvider.contentChanged(LuceneIndexProvider.java:73)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.BackgroundObserver$1$1.call(BackgroundObserver.java:127)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit.BackgroundObserver$1$1.call(BackgroundObserver.java:121)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:262)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: open
> at org.bson.util.Assertions.isTrue(Assertions.java:36)
> at
> com.mongodb.DBTCPConnector.isMongosConnection(DBTCPConnector.java:367)
> at com.mongodb.Mongo.isMongosConnection(Mongo.java:622)
> at com.mongodb.DBCursor._check(DBCursor.java:494)
> at com.mongodb.DBCursor._hasNext(DBCursor.java:621)
> at
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7382) Cloud datastore without local disk
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7382: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Cloud datastore without local disk > -- > > Key: OAK-7382 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7382 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: blob, blob-cloud >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Amit Jain >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Currently, the S3 datastores need local disk to work (not sure about the > Azure one). > This should not be needed (not for upload, caching,...). > Also, temporary files for garbage collection should not be needed (instead, > use temporary binaries, possibly written to S3 / Azure). > Really everything should fit in a few MB of memory. > For S3, it might be needed to read a few MB of data into memory, and then > possibly do a multipart upload: > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8653146/can-i-stream-a-file-upload-to-s3-without-a-content-length-header -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5152) Improve overflow handling in ChangeSetFilterImpl
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5152: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Improve overflow handling in ChangeSetFilterImpl > > > Key: OAK-5152 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5152 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core >Affects Versions: 1.5.14 >Reporter: Stefan Egli >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > As described in OAK-5151 when a ChangeSet overflows, the ChangeSetFilterImpl > treats the changes as included and doesn't go further into the remaining, > perhaps not-overflown other sets. Besides more testing it wouldn't be much > effort to change this though. Putting this as outside of 1.6 scope for now > though. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3355) Test failure: SpellcheckTest.testSpellcheckMultipleWords
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-3355:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Test failure: SpellcheckTest.testSpellcheckMultipleWords
>
>
> Key: OAK-3355
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3355
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: solr
>Affects Versions: 1.0.24
> Environment:
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/
>Reporter: Michael Dürig
>Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
>Priority: Major
> Labels: ci, jenkins, test, test-failure
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.SpellcheckTest.testSpellcheckMultipleWords}}
> fails on Jenkins.
> Failure seen at builds: 389, 392, 395, 396, 562
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/396/jdk=jdk-1.6u45,label=Ubuntu,nsfixtures=DOCUMENT_RDB,profile=unittesting/console
> {noformat}
> testSpellcheckMultipleWords(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.SpellcheckTest)
> Time elapsed: 0.907 sec <<< FAILURE!
> junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[voting[ in] ontario]> but
> was:<[voting[, voted,] ontario]>
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:85)
> at junit.framework.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.SpellcheckTest.testSpellcheckMultipleWords(SpellcheckTest.java:86)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6501) Support adding or updating index definitions via oak-run: JSON data format
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6501?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6501:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Support adding or updating index definitions via oak-run: JSON data format
> --
>
> Key: OAK-6501
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6501
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> In OAK-6471 we have support for index definitions via JSON.
> I'm not happy with the escaping (OAK-6476) ("If the string starts with
> namespace..."), I think it's a bit dangerous. Need to investigate whether
> this prevents importing index definitions exported via JSON
> (localhost:/oak:index/lucene.tidy.-1.json).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5924) Prevent long running query from delaying refresh of index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5924:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Prevent long running query from delaying refresh of index
> -
>
> Key: OAK-5924
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5924
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Whenever the index gets updated {{IndexTracker}} detects the changes and open
> new {{IndexNode}} and closes old index nodes. This flow would block untill
> all old IndexNode are closed.
> IndexNode close itself relies on a writer lock. It can happen that a long
> running query i.e. a query which is about to read a page of large is
> currently executing on the old IndexNode instance. This query is trying load
> 100k docs and is very slow (due to loading of excerpt) then such a query
> would prevent the IndexNode from getting closed. This in turn would prevent
> the index from seeing latest data and become stale.
> To make query and indexing more resilient we should look if current IndexNode
> being used for query is closing or not. If closing then query should open a
> fresh searcher
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-1905) SegmentMK: Arch segment(s)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1905?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-1905: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > SegmentMK: Arch segment(s) > -- > > Key: OAK-1905 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1905 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Jukka Zitting >Priority: Minor > Labels: perfomance, scalability > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > There are a lot of constants and other commonly occurring name, values and > other data in a typical repository. To optimize storage space and access > speed, it would be useful to place such data in one or more constant "arch > segments" that are always cached in memory. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6919) SegmentCache might introduce unwanted memory references to SegmentId instances
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6919:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> SegmentCache might introduce unwanted memory references to SegmentId instances
> --
>
> Key: OAK-6919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6919
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: segment-tar
>Reporter: Francesco Mari
>Assignee: Francesco Mari
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> {{SegmentCache}} contains, through the underlying Guava cache, hard
> references to both {{SegmentId}} and {{Segment}} instances. Thus,
> {{SegmentCache}} contributes to the computation of in-memory references that,
> in turn, constitute the root references of the garbage collection algorithm.
> Further investigations are needed to assess this statement but, if
> {{SegmentCache}} is proved to be problematic, there are some possible
> solutions.
> For example, {{SegmentCache}} might be reworked to store references to
> MSB/LSB pairs as keys, instead of to {{SegmentId}} instances. Moreover,
> instead of referencing {{Segment}} instances as values, {{SegmentCache}}
> might hold references to their underlying {{ByteBuffer}}. With these changes
> in place, {{SegmentCache}} would not interfere with {{SegmentTracker}} and
> the garbage collection algorithm.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6288) Test failure: upgrade tests failing: Failed to copy content
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6288:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Test failure: upgrade tests failing: Failed to copy content
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6288
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6288
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration, upgrade
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
> Labels: CI, jenkins, test-failure
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Jenkins CI failure: https://builds.apache.org/view/J/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #364 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #364|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/364/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/364/console]
> Failing tests:
> {noformat}
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.CopyCheckpointsTest.validateMigration[Suppress
> the warning]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.CopyCheckpointsTest.validateMigration[Source
> data store defined, checkpoints migrated]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.IgnoreMissingBinariesTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.UpgradeOldSegmentTest.upgradeFrom10
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentTarToSegmentTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToJdbcTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentTarTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentTarWithMissingDestinationDirectoryTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentWithMissingDestinationDirectoryTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, no blobstores defined, segment -> segment]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, no blobstores defined, segment-tar -> segment-tar]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, no blobstores defined, segment -> segment-tar]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> embedded to embedded, no blobstores defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> embedded to external, no blobstores defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, src blobstore defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> external to embedded, src blobstore defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> external to external, src blobstore defined]
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.FbsToFbsTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.FbsToFdsTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.FdsToFbsTest.validateMigration
> {noformat}
> All seem to fail with
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 3.737
> s <<< FAILURE! - in
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentTarToSegmentTest
> [ERROR]
> validateMigration(org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentTarToSegmentTest)
> Time elapsed: 3.73 s <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.RuntimeException: javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Failed to copy
> content
> Caused by: javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Failed to copy content
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5984) Property indexes can get ouf of sync
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5984: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Property indexes can get ouf of sync > > > Key: OAK-5984 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5984 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: property-index >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Property indexes can get out of sync for the following reasons: > * the index was disabled for some time > * the property index component was not started / configured > * the index definition was changed without reindexing -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7116) Use JMX mode to reindex on SegmentNodeStore without requiring manual steps
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7116?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7116: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Use JMX mode to reindex on SegmentNodeStore without requiring manual steps > -- > > Key: OAK-7116 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7116 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: run >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > oak-run indexing for SegmentNodeStore currently require following steps while > performing indexing against a repository which is in use [1] > # Create checkpoint via MBean and pass it as part of cli args > # Perform actual indexing with read only access to repo > # Import the index via MBean operation > As per current documented steps #1 and #3 are manual. This can potentially be > simplified by directly using JMX operation from within oak-run as currently > for accessing SegmentNodeStore oak-run needs to run on same host as actual > application > *JMX Access* > JMX access can be done via following ways > # Application using Oak has JMX remote > ## Enabled and same info provided as cli args > ## Not enabled - In such a case we can rely on > ### pid and [local > connection|https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13252914/how-to-connect-to-a-local-jmx-server-by-knowing-the-process-id] > or [attach|https://github.com/nickman/jmxlocal] > ### Or query all running java prcess jmx and check if SegmentNodeStore repo > path is same as one provided in cli > # Application using OAk > *Proposed Approach* > # Establish the JMX connection > # Create checkpoint using the JMX connection programatically > # Perform indexing with read only access > # Import the index via JMX access > With this indexing support for SegmentNodeStore would be at par with > DocumentNodeStore in terms of ease of use > [1] https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query/oak-run-indexing.html -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6761) Convert oak-blob-plugins to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6761: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-blob-plugins to OSGi R6 annotations > --- > > Key: OAK-6761 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6761 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: blob-plugins >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3219) Lucene IndexPlanner should also account for number of property constraints evaluated while giving cost estimation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-3219:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Lucene IndexPlanner should also account for number of property constraints
> evaluated while giving cost estimation
> -
>
> Key: OAK-3219
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3219
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Currently the cost returned by Lucene index is a function of number of
> indexed documents present in the index. If the number of indexed entries are
> high then it might reduce chances of this index getting selected if some
> property index also support of the property constraint.
> {noformat}
> /jcr:root/content/freestyle-cms/customers//element(*, cq:Page)
> [(jcr:content/@title = 'm' or jcr:like(jcr:content/@title, 'm%'))
> and jcr:content/@sling:resourceType = '/components/page/customer’]
> {noformat}
> Consider above query with following index definition
> * A property index on resourceType
> * A Lucene index for cq:Page with properties {{jcr:content/title}},
> {{jcr:content/sling:resourceType}} indexed and also path restriction
> evaluation enabled
> Now what the two indexes can help in
> # Property index
> ## Path restriction
> ## Property restriction on {{sling:resourceType}}
> # Lucene index
> ## NodeType restriction
> ## Property restriction on {{sling:resourceType}}
> ## Property restriction on {{title}}
> ## Path restriction
> Now cost estimate currently works like this
> * Property index - {{f(indexedValueEstimate, estimateOfNodesUnderGivenPath)}}
> ** indexedValueEstimate - For 'sling:resourceType=foo' its the approximate
> count for nodes having that as 'foo'
> ** estimateOfNodesUnderGivenPath - Its derived from an approximate estimation
> of nodes present under given path
> * Lucene Index - {{f(totalIndexedEntries)}}
> As cost of Lucene is too simple it does not reflect the reality. Following 2
> changes can be done to make it better
> * Given that Lucene index can handle multiple constraints compared (4) to
> property index (2), the cost estimate returned by it should also reflect this
> state. This can be done by setting costPerEntry to 1/(no of property
> restriction evaluated)
> * Get the count for queried property value - This is similar to what
> PropertyIndex does and assumes that Lucene can provide that information in
> O(1) cost. In case of multiple supported property restriction this can be
> minima of all
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3437) Regression in org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.JoinTest#testJoinWithOR5 when enabling OAK-1617
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3437?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-3437:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Regression in org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.JoinTest#testJoinWithOR5 when
> enabling OAK-1617
> --
>
> Key: OAK-3437
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3437
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: solr
>Reporter: Davide Giannella
>Assignee: Tommaso Teofili
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> When enabling OAK-1617 (still to be committed) there's a regression in the
> {{oak-solr-core}} unit tests
> - {{org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.JoinTest#testJoinWithOR3}}
> - {{org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.JoinTest#testJoinWithOR4}}
> - {{org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.JoinTest#testJoinWithOR5}}
> The WIP of the feature can be found in
> https://github.com/davidegiannella/jackrabbit-oak/tree/OAK-1617 and a full
> patch will be attached shortly for review in OAK-1617 itself.
> The feature is currently disabled, in order to enable it for unit testing an
> approach like this can be taken
> https://github.com/davidegiannella/jackrabbit-oak/blob/177df1a8073b1237857267e23d12a433e3d890a4/oak-core/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/query/SQL2OptimiseQueryTest.java#L142
> or setting the system property {{-Doak.query.sql2optimisation}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6421) Phase out JCR Locking support
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6421?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6421: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Phase out JCR Locking support > - > > Key: OAK-6421 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6421 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Task > Components: jcr >Reporter: Marcel Reutegger >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Oak currently has a lot of gaps in its JCR Locking implementation (see > OAK-1962), which basically makes it non-compliant with the JCR specification. > I propose we phase out the support for JCR Locking because a proper > implementation would be rather complex with a runtime behaviour that is very > different in a standalone deployment compared to a cluster. In the standalone > case a lock could be acquired very quickly, while in the distributed case, > the operations would be multiple orders of magnitude slower, depending on how > cluster nodes are geographically distributed. > Applications that rely on strict lock semantics should use other mechanisms, > built explicitly for this purpose. E.g. Apache Zookeeper. > To ease upgrade and migration to a different lock mechanism, the proposal is > to introduce a flag or configuration that controls the level of support for > JCR Locking: > - DISABLED: the implementation does not support JCR Locking at all. Methods > will throw UnsupportedRepositoryOperationException when defined by the JCR > specification. > - DEPRECATED: the implementation behaves as right now, but logs a warn or > error message that JCR Locking does not work as specified and will be removed > in a future version of Oak. > In a later release (e.g. 1.10) the current JCR Locking implementation would > be removed entirely and unconditionally throw an exception. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6741) Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6741: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Switch to official OSGi component and metatype annotations > -- > > Key: OAK-6741 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6741 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > Attachments: OAK-6741-proposed-changes-chetans-feedback.patch, > osgi-metadata-1.7.8.json, osgi-metadata-trunk.json > > > We should remove the 'old' Felix SCR annotations and move to the 'new' OSGi > R6 annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6833) LuceneIndex*Test failures
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6833:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> LuceneIndex*Test failures
> -
>
> Key: OAK-6833
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6833
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments:
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.xml,
>
> TEST-org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.xml,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexAugmentTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.txt,
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.txt,
> unit-tests.log, unit-tests.log, unit-tests.log
>
>
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] testLuceneWithRelativeProperty[1: useBlobStore
> (false)](org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest)
> Time elapsed: 0.063 s <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected: but was:
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene.LuceneIndexEditorTest.testLuceneWithRelativeProperty(LuceneIndexEditorTest.java:341)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6774) Convert oak-upgrade to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6774?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6774: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-upgrade to OSGi R6 annotations > -- > > Key: OAK-6774 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6774 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: upgrade >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5488) BackgroundObserver MBean report Listener class again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5488:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> BackgroundObserver MBean report Listener class again
>
>
> Key: OAK-5488
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5488
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core, jcr
>Affects Versions: 1.5.18
>Reporter: Stefan Eissing
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> The MBean stats for {{BackgroundObserverStats}} used to give the className of
> the listening class.
> With the introduction of {{FilteringDispatcher}} all MBeans only list that
> class name, making it difficult to find out which observer really is shown.
> Proposal: show the effective className as before again.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7193) DataStore: API to retrieve statistic (file headers, size estimation)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7193:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> DataStore: API to retrieve statistic (file headers, size estimation)
>
>
> Key: OAK-7193
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7193
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: blob
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Extension of OAK-6254: in addition to retrieving the size, it would be good
> to retrieve the estimated number and total size per file type. A simple (and
> in my view sufficient) solution is to use the first few bytes ("magic
> numbers", 2 bytes should be enough) to get the file type. That would allow to
> estimate, for example, the number of, and total size, of PDF files, JPEG,
> Lucene index and so on. A histogram would be nice as well, but I think is not
> needed.
> To speed up calculation, the blob ID could be extended with the first 2 bytes
> of the file content, that is: #@ where magic is the
> first two bytes, in hex. That would allow to quickly get the data from the
> blob ids (no need to actually read content).
> Sampling should be enough. The longer it takes, the more accurate the data.
> We could store the data while doing datastore GC, in which case the returned
> data would be somewhat stale; that's OK.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6261) Log queries that sort by un-indexed properties
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6261: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Log queries that sort by un-indexed properties > -- > > Key: OAK-6261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6261 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Queries that can read many nodes, and sort by properties that are not > indexed, can be very slow. This includes for example fulltext queries. > As a start, it might make sense to log an "info" level message (but avoid > logging the same message each time a query is run). Per configuration, this > could be turned to "warning". -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5316) Rewrite JcrPathParser and JcrNameParser with good test coverage
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5316:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Rewrite JcrPathParser and JcrNameParser with good test coverage
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-5316
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5316
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
>Affects Versions: 1.5.15
>Reporter: Julian Sedding
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> As discussed in OAK-5260 the implementation of the {{JcrPathParser}} and
> possibly also the {{JcrNameParser}} are not ideal, i.e. there are potentially
> many bugs hiding in edge-case scenarios. The parsers' test coverage is also
> lacking, which is problematic as these code paths get executed very
> frequently.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7660) Refactor AzureCompact and Compact
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7660:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Refactor AzureCompact and Compact
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7660
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7660
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: segment-tar
>Reporter: Andrei Dulceanu
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
> Labels: tech-debt, technical_debt, tooling
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> {{AzureCompact}} in {{oak-segment-azure}} follows closely the structure and
> logic of {{Compact}} in {{oak-segment-tar}}. Since the only thing which
> differs is the underlying persistence used (remote in Azure vs. local in TAR
> files), the common logic should be extracted in a super-class, extended by
> both.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3236) integration test that simulates influence of clock drift
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-3236: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > integration test that simulates influence of clock drift > > > Key: OAK-3236 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3236 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Test > Components: core >Affects Versions: 1.3.4 >Reporter: Stefan Egli >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Spin-off of OAK-2739 [of this > comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2739?focusedCommentId=14693398=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14693398] > - ie there should be an integration test that show cases the issues with > clock drift and why it is a good idea to have a lease-check (that refuses to > let the document store be used any further once the lease times out locally) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7744) Persistent cache for the Segment Node Store
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7744?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7744:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Persistent cache for the Segment Node Store
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-7744
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7744
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Story
> Components: segment-tar
>Reporter: Tomek Rękawek
>Assignee: Tomek Rękawek
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-7744.patch
>
>
> With the introduction of custom, remote persistence mechanisms for the
> SegmentMK (namely the Azure Segment Store), it makes sense to create another
> level of cache, apart from the on-heap segment cache which is currently used.
> Let's implement the persistent cache, using the existing {{TarFiles}} class
> and storing the processed segments on disk. It may be created as a
> pass-through {{SegmentNodeStorePersistence}} implementation, so it can be
> composed with other existing persistence implementations, eg. [split
> persistence|OAK-7735].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7390) QueryResult.getSize() can be slow for many "or" or "union" conditions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7390: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > QueryResult.getSize() can be slow for many "or" or "union" conditions > - > > Key: OAK-7390 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7390 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > For queries with many union conditions, the "fast" getSize method can > actually be slower than iterating over the result. > The reason is, the number of index calls grows exponential with regards to > number of subqueries: (3x + x^2) / 2, where x is the number of subqueries. > For this to have a measurable affect, the number of subqueries needs to be > large (more than 100), and the index needs to be slow. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-1150) NodeType index: don't index all primary and mixin types
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-1150: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > NodeType index: don't index all primary and mixin types > --- > > Key: OAK-1150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1150 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: property-index >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Currently, the nodetype index indexes all primary types and mixin types > (including nt:base I think). > This results in many nodes in this index, which unnecessarily increases the > repository size, but doesn't really help executing queries (running a query > to get all nt:base nodes doesn't benefit much from using the nodetype index). > It should also help reduce writes in updating the index, for example for > OAK-1099 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7372) Update FileDataStore recommendation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7372: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Update FileDataStore recommendation > --- > > Key: OAK-7372 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7372 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Documentation > Components: doc >Reporter: Marcel Reutegger >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > The BlobStore documentation currently mentions use of a FileDataStore only > for deployments when the data store is shared between multiple repository > instances. The documentation should be updated to also recommend the > FileDataStore when a repository has many binaries. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6513) Journal based Async Indexer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6513:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Journal based Async Indexer
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6513
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6513
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: indexing
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Current async indexer design is based on NodeState diff. This has served us
> fine so far however off late it is not able to perform well if rate of
> repository writes is high. When changes happen faster than index-update can
> process them, larger and larger diffs will happen. These make index-updates
> slower, which again lead to the next diff being ever larger than the one
> before (assuming a constant ingestion rate).
> In current diff based flow the indexer performs complete diff for all changes
> happening between 2 cycle. It may happen that lots of writes happens but not
> much indexable content is written. So doing diff there is a wasted effort.
> In 1.6 release for NRT Indexing we implemented a journal based indexing for
> external changes(OAK-4808, OAK-5430). That approach can be generalized and
> used for async indexing.
> Before talking about the journal based approach lets see how IndexEditor work
> currently
> h4. IndexEditor
> Currently any IndexEditor performs 2 tasks
> # Identify which node is to be indexed based on some index definition. The
> Editor gets invoked as part of content diff where it determines which
> NodeState is to be indexed
> # Update the index based on node to be indexed
> For e.g. in oak-lucene we have LuceneIndexEditor which identifies the
> NodeStates to be indexed and LuceneDocumentMaker which constructs the Lucene
> Document from NodeState to be indexed. For journal based approach we can
> decouple these 2 parts and thus have
> * IndexEditor - Identifies which all paths need to be indexed for given index
> definition
> * IndexUpdater - Updates the index based on given NodeState and its path
> h4. High Level Flow
> # Session Commit Flow
> ## Each index type would provide a IndexEditor which would be invoked as part
> of commit (like sync indexes). These IndexEditor would just determine which
> paths needs to be indexed.
> ## As part of commit the paths to be indexed would be written to journal.
> # AsyncIndexUpdate flow
> ## AsyncIndexUpdate would query this journal to fetch all such indexed paths
> between the 2 checkpoints
> ## Based on the index path data it would invoke the {{IndexUpdater}} to
> update the index for that path
> ## Merge the index updates
> h4. Benefits
> Such a design would have following impact
> # More work done as part of write
> # Marking of indexable content is distributed hence at indexing time lesser
> work to be done
> # Indexing can progress in batches
> # The indexers can be called in parallel
> h4. Journal Implementation
> DocumentNodeStore currently has an in built journal which is being used for
> NRT Indexing. That feature can be exposed as an api.
> For scaling index this design is mostly required for cluster case. So we can
> possibly have both indexing support implemented and use the journal based
> support for DocumentNodeStore setups. Or we can look into implementing such a
> journal for SegmentNodeStore setups also
> h4. Open Points
> * Journal support in SegmentNodeStore
> * Handling deletes.
> Detailed proposal -
> https://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/Journal%20based%20Async%20Indexer
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7079) Enable oak-run indexing to connect to secondary node in Mongo replica set
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7079: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Enable oak-run indexing to connect to secondary node in Mongo replica set > - > > Key: OAK-7079 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7079 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: mongomk, run >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > With OAK-6353 support for document order traversal based indexing has been > added. Currently it connects to Mongo primary. > We need to test and validate if it can be made only to connect to Mongo > secondary for below 2 cases > # Pre created checkpoint - Here checkpoint is created already and then > oak-run *only* connects to Mongo secondary > # Online indexing - Here oak-run would also create checkpoint. However it > would need to be ensured that when it performs the document order traversal > query that query is handled by Mongo secondary and oak-run logic ensures that > secondary node has the created checkpoint -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7328) Update DocumentNodeStore based OakFixture
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7328: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Update DocumentNodeStore based OakFixture > - > > Key: OAK-7328 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7328 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: run >Reporter: Marcel Reutegger >Assignee: Marcel Reutegger >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > The current OakFixtures using a DocumentNodeStore use a configuration / setup > which is different from what a default DocumentNodeStoreService would use. It > would be better if benchmarks run with a configuration close to a default > setup. The main differences identified are: > - Does not have a proper executor, which means some tasks are executed with > the same thread. > - Does not use a separate persistent cache for the journal (diff cache). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5782) Test failure: persistentCache.BroadcastTest.broadcastTCP
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5782: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Test failure: persistentCache.BroadcastTest.broadcastTCP > - > > Key: OAK-5782 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5782 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: cache, continuous integration, core >Affects Versions: 1.6.0 >Reporter: Hudson >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Labels: test-failure, ubuntu > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Jenkins CI failure: > https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/ > The build Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix/Ubuntu Slaves=ubuntu,jdk=JDK 1.8 > (latest),nsfixtures=SEGMENT_TAR,profile=unittesting #1447 has failed. > First failed run: [Apache Jackrabbit Oak matrix/Ubuntu Slaves=ubuntu,jdk=JDK > 1.8 (latest),nsfixtures=SEGMENT_TAR,profile=unittesting > #1447|https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/Ubuntu%20Slaves=ubuntu,jdk=JDK%201.8%20(latest),nsfixtures=SEGMENT_TAR,profile=unittesting/1447/] > [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/Ubuntu%20Slaves=ubuntu,jdk=JDK%201.8%20(latest),nsfixtures=SEGMENT_TAR,profile=unittesting/1447/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7261) DocumentStore: inconsistent behaviour for invalid Strings as document ID
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7261: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > DocumentStore: inconsistent behaviour for invalid Strings as document ID > > > Key: OAK-7261 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7261 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: documentmk, mongomk, rdbmk >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > - H2DB and Derby roundtrip any string > - PostgreSQL rejects the invalid string early > - DB2 and Oracle fail the same way as segment store (they persist the > replacement character) (see OAK-5506) > - MySQL and SQLServer fail the same way as DB2 and Oracle, but here it's the > RDBDocumentStore's fault, because the ID column is binary, and we transform > to byte sequences ourselves > - Mongo claims it saved the document, but upon lookup, returns something > with a different ID > Note that due to how RDB reads work, the returned document has the ID that > was requested, not what the DB actually contains. > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7074) Ensure that all Documents are read with document order traversal indexing
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7074: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Ensure that all Documents are read with document order traversal indexing > - > > Key: OAK-7074 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7074 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: mongomk, run >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > With OAK-6353 support was added for document order traversal indexing. In > this mode we open a DB cursor and try to read all documents from it using > document order traversal. Such a cursor may remain open for long time (2-4 > hrs) and its possible that document may get reordered by the Mongo storage > engine. This would result in 2 aspects to be thought about > # Duplicate documents - Same document may appear more than once in result set > # Possibly missed document - It may be a possibility that a document got > moved and missed becoming part of cursor. > Both these aspects would need to be handled -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8288) fix javadoc:javadoc for jdk >= 13
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-8288: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > fix javadoc:javadoc for jdk >= 13 > - > > Key: OAK-8288 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8288 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug >Reporter: Julian Reschke >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Minor > Labels: candidate_oak_1_10 > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > Attachments: JavaDocHtmlHeaderTest.java > > > Javadoc in JDK 13 makes additional HTML validity checks: > * nesting of headlines ( after is an error) > * empty tags -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3598) Export cache related classes for usage in other oak bundle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-3598:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Export cache related classes for usage in other oak bundle
> --
>
> Key: OAK-3598
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3598
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: cache
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Labels: tech-debt
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> For OAK-3092 oak-lucene would need to access classes from
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.cache}} package. For now its limited to
> {{CacheStats}} to expose the cache related statistics.
> This task is meant to determine steps needed to export the package
> * Update the pom.xml to export the package
> * Review current set of classes to see if they need to be reviewed
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6408) Review package exports for o.a.j.oak.plugins.index.*
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6408: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Review package exports for o.a.j.oak.plugins.index.* > > > Key: OAK-6408 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6408 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: core, indexing >Reporter: angela >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > while working on OAK-6304 and OAK-6355, i noticed that the > _o.a.j.oak.plugins.index.*_ contains both internal api/utilities and > implementation details which get equally exported (though without having any > package export version set). > in the light of the modularization effort, i would like to suggest that we > try to sort that out and separate the _public_ parts from implementation > details. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6766) Convert oak-lucene to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6766: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-lucene to OSGi R6 annotations > - > > Key: OAK-6766 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6766 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: lucene >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-2182) Specify collection to be used by Solr index
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-2182: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Specify collection to be used by Solr index > --- > > Key: OAK-2182 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2182 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: solr >Affects Versions: 1.1.0 >Reporter: Tommaso Teofili >Assignee: Tommaso Teofili >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Currently all the information to hit a Solr server is hold by the singleton > SolrServerProvider while there are some use cases where more than one query > index definition for a Solr index may be done, targeting different content, > and therefore it'd be good to be able to specify which collection should be > used by each of these indexes. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6387) Building an index (new index + reindex): temporarily store blob references
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6387: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Building an index (new index + reindex): temporarily store blob references > -- > > Key: OAK-6387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6387 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: lucene, query >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > If reindexing a Lucene index takes multiple days, and if datastore garbage > collection (DSGC) is run during that time, then DSGC may remove binaries of > that index because they are not referenced. > It would be good if all binaries that are needed, and that are older than > (for example) one hour, are referenced during reindexing (for example in a > temporary location). So that DSGC will not remove them. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6773) Convert oak-store-composite to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6773?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6773: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-store-composite to OSGi R6 annotations > -- > > Key: OAK-6773 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6773 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: composite >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7457) "Covariant return type change detected" warnings with java10
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7457:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> "Covariant return type change detected" warnings with java10
>
>
> Key: OAK-7457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7457
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentmk, segment-tar
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Julian Reschke
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> We have quite a few warnings of type "Covariant return type change detected":
> {noformat}
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\broadcast\TCPBroadcaster.java:327:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.flip() has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.flip()
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\broadcast\UDPBroadcaster.java:135:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\broadcast\UDPBroadcaster.java:138:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\broadcast\TCPBroadcaster.java:226:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\broadcast\InMemoryBroadcaster.java:35:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\PersistentCache.java:519:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\PersistentCache.java:522:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-store-document\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\plugins\document\persistentCache\PersistentCache.java:535:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-segment-tar\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\segment\data\SegmentDataV12.java:196:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-segment-tar\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\segment\data\SegmentDataV12.java:197:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-segment-tar\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\segment\data\SegmentDataUtils.java:57:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-segment-tar\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\segment\data\SegmentDataUtils.java:58:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(int)
> [INFO]
> C:\projects\apache\oak\trunk\oak-segment-tar\src\main\java\org\apache\jackrabbit\oak\segment\file\tar\index\IndexWriter.java:110:
> Covariant return type change detected: java.nio.Buffer
> java.nio.ByteBuffer.position(int) has been changed to java.nio.ByteBuffer
>
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6844) Consistency checker Directory value is always ":data"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6844:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Consistency checker Directory value is always ":data"
> -
>
> Key: OAK-6844
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6844
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
>Affects Versions: 1.7.9
>Reporter: Paul Chibulcuteanu
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> When running a _fullCheck_ consistency check from the Lucene Index statistics
> MBean, the _Directory_ results is always _:data_
> See below:
> {code}
> /oak:index/lucene => VALID
> Size : 42.3 MB
> Directory : :data
> Size : 42.3 MB
> Num docs : 159132
> CheckIndex status : true
> Time taken : 3.544 s
> {code}
> I'm not really sure what information should be put here, but the _:data_
> value is confusing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5958) Document Metrics related classes and interfaces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5958:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Document Metrics related classes and interfaces
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-5958
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5958
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
>Reporter: Michael Dürig
>Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Labels: documentation, technical_debt
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> The Metrics related classes and interfaces in
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.stats}} and
> {{org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.metric}} are largely undocumented.
> Specifically it is not immediately how they should be used, how a new
> {{Stats}} instance should be added, what the effect this would have and how
> it would (or would) not be exposed (e.g. via JMX).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7043) Collect SegmentStore stats as part of status zip
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7043: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Collect SegmentStore stats as part of status zip > > > Key: OAK-7043 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7043 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Priority: Major > Labels: monitoring, production > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Many times while investigating issue we request customer to provide to size > of segmentstore and at times list of segmentstore directory. It would be > useful if there is an InventoryPrinter for SegmentStore which can include > * Size of segment store > * Listing of segment store directory > * Possibly tail of journal.log > * Possibly some stats/info from index files stored in tar files -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6897) XPath query: option to _not_ convert "or" to "union"
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6897: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > XPath query: option to _not_ convert "or" to "union" > > > Key: OAK-6897 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6897 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: query >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Trivial > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Right now, all XPath queries that contain "or" of the form "@a=1 or @b=2" are > converted to SQL-2 "union". In some cases, this is a problem, specially in > combination with "order by @jcr:score desc". > Now that SQL-2 "or" conditions can be converted to union (depending if union > has a lower cost), it is no longer strictly needed to do the union conversion > in the XPath conversion. Or at least emit different SQL-2 queries and take > the one with the lowest cost. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6628) More precise indexRules support via filtering criteria on property
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6628?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6628:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> More precise indexRules support via filtering criteria on property
> --
>
> Key: OAK-6628
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6628
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> For Lucene index we currently support indexRules based on nodetype. Here the
> recommendation is that users must use most precise nodeType/mixinType to
> target the indexing rule so that only relevant nodes are indexed.
> For many Sling based applications its being seen that lots of content is
> nt:unstructured and it uses {{sling:resourceType}} property to distinguish
> various such nt:unstructured nodes. Currently its not possible to target
> index definition to index only those nt:unstructured which have specific
> {{sling:resourceType}}. Which makes it harder to provide a more precise index
> definitions.
> To help such cases we can generalize the indexRule support via a filtering
> criteria
> {noformat}
> activityIndex
> - type = "lucene"
> + indexRules
> + nt:unstructured
> - filter-property = "sling:resourceType"
> - filter-value = "app/activitystreams/components/activity"
> + properties
> - jcr:primaryType = "nt:unstructured"
> + verb
> - propertyIndex = true
> - name = "verb"
> {noformat}
> So indexRule would have 2 more config properties
> * filter-property - Name of property to match
> * filter-value - The value to match
> *Indexing*
> At time of indexing currently LuceneIndexEditor does a
> {{indexDefinition.getApplicableIndexingRule}} passing it the NodeState.
> Currently this checks only for jcr:PrimaryType and jxr:mixins to find
> matching rule.
> This logic would need to be extended to also check if any filter-property is
> defined in definition. If yes then check if NodeState has that value
> *Querying*
> On query side we need to change the IndexPlanner where it currently use query
> nodetype for finding matching indexRule. In addition it would need to pass on
> the property restrictions and the rule only be matched if the property
> restriction matches the filter
> *Open Item*
> # How to handle change in filter-property value. I think we have similar
> problem currently if an index nodes nodeType gets changed. In such a case we
> do not remove it from index. So we need to solve that for both
> # Ensure that all places where rules are matched account for this filter
> concept
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7370) order by jcr:score desc doesn't work across union query created by optimizing OR clauses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7370:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> order by jcr:score desc doesn't work across union query created by optimizing
> OR clauses
>
>
> Key: OAK-7370
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7370
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
>Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Merging of sub-queries created due to optimizing OR clauses doesn't work for
> sorting on {{jcr:score}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-2727) NodeStateSolrServersObserver should be filtering path selectively
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-2727: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > NodeStateSolrServersObserver should be filtering path selectively > - > > Key: OAK-2727 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2727 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: solr >Affects Versions: 1.1.8 >Reporter: Tommaso Teofili >Assignee: Tommaso Teofili >Priority: Major > Labels: performance > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > As discussed in OAK-2718 it'd be good to be able to selectively find Solr > indexes by path, as done in Lucene index, see also OAK-2570. > This would avoid having to do full diffs. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6303) Cache in CachingBlobStore might grow beyond configured limit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6303:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Cache in CachingBlobStore might grow beyond configured limit
>
>
> Key: OAK-6303
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6303
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: blob, core
>Reporter: Julian Reschke
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-6303-test.diff, OAK-6303.diff
>
>
> It appears that depending on actual cache entry sizes, the {{CacheLIRS}}
> might grow beyond the configured limit.
> For {{RDBBlobStore}}, the limit is currently configured to 16MB, yet storing
> random 2M entries appears to fill the cache with 64MB of data (according to
> it's own stats).
> The attached test case reproduces this.
> (it seems this is caused by the fact that each of the 16 segments of the
> cache can hold 2 entries, no matter how big they are...)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7922) Improve the operations and the reporting of the check command
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7922:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Improve the operations and the reporting of the check command
> -
>
> Key: OAK-7922
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7922
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: segment-tar
>Reporter: Francesco Mari
>Assignee: Francesco Mari
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: OAK-7922-01.patch
>
>
> The check command allows a user to check for both the head and the
> checkpoints. At the end of the execution the command outputs the consistent
> revisions for the head and the individual checkpoints, if any is found.
> Moreover, it prints an overall good revision. The consistent revisions for
> the head and the checkpoints could all be different. If both the head and all
> the checkpoints are assigned to a consistent revision, the overall good
> revision is the oldest of those revisions.
> I wonder how useful all of this information is to a user of the command:
> - I might have a revision where a checkpoint is consistent, but the head is
> not. In this case, I don't want to revert to that revision because my system
> will probably be unstable due to the inconsistent head.
> - The overall good revision might still be partially inconsistent due to the
> way the command short-circuits the consistency check on the head and the
> checkpoints. If I revert to the overall good revision, the head might still
> be inconsistent or one of the checkpoints might be missing.
> I propose to remove the {{\--checkpoints}} and the {{\--head}} flags and
> define the behaviour of the command as follows.
> - The check command checks one super-root at a time in its entirety (both
> head and referenced checkpoints).
> - The command exits as soon as a super-root is found where both the head and
> all the checkpoints are consistent.
> - While searching, the command might find a super-root with a consistent
> head but one or more inconsistent checkpoint. In this case, the first of such
> revisions is printed, specifying which checkpoints are inconsistent.
> - The user might specify a {{--no-checkpoints}} flag to skip checking the
> checkpoints in the steps above.
> The optimisations currently implemented by the check command can be
> maintained. We don't need to fully traverse the head or the checkpoints if a
> well-known corrupted path is still corrupted in the current iteration. The
> approach proposed above enables additional optimisations:
> - Since checkpoints are immutable, the command doesn't need to traverse a
> checkpoint that was inspected before. This is true regardless of the
> consistency of the checkpoint.
> - If a super-root includes a checkpoint that was previously determined
> corrupted, the command can skip that super-root without further inspection.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6166) Support versioning in the composite node store
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6166: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Support versioning in the composite node store > -- > > Key: OAK-6166 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6166 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: composite >Reporter: Tomek Rękawek >Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > The mount info provider should affect the versioning code as well, so version > histories for the mounted paths are stored separately. Similarly to what we > have in the indexing, let's store the mounted version histories under: > /jcr:system/jcr:versionStorage/:oak:mount-MOUNTNAME -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5159) Killing the process may stop async index update to to 30 minutes, for DocumentStore (MongoDB, RDB)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5159: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Killing the process may stop async index update to to 30 minutes, for > DocumentStore (MongoDB, RDB) > -- > > Key: OAK-5159 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5159 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: indexing >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Labels: resilience > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Same as OAK-2108, when using a DocumentStore based repository (MongoDB, > RDBMK). This is also a problem in the single-cluster-node case, not just when > using multiple cluster node. > When killing a node that is running the sync index update, then this async > index update will not run for up to 15 minutes, because the lease time is set > to 15 minutes. > We could probably use Oak / Sling Discovery to improve the situation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5927) Load excerpt lazily
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5927:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Load excerpt lazily
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-5927
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5927
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Currently LucenePropertyIndex loads the excerpt eagerly in batch as part of
> loadDocs call. The load docs batch size doubles starting from 50 (max 100k)
> as more data is read.
> We should look into ways to make the excerpt loaded lazily as and when caller
> ask for excerpt.
> Note that currently the excerpt are only loaded when query request for
> excerpt i.e. there is a not null property restriction for {{rep:excerpt}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6309) Not always convert XPath "primaryType in a, b" to union
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6309:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Not always convert XPath "primaryType in a, b" to union
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-6309
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6309
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: query
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Currently, queries with multiple primary types are always converted to a
> "union", but this is not alway the best solution. The main problem is that
> results are not sorted by score as expected. Example:
> {noformat}
> /jcr:root/content//element(*, nt:hierarchyNode)[jcr:contains(., 'abc)
> and (@jcr:primaryType = 'acme:Page' or @jcr:primaryType = 'acme:Asset')]
> {noformat}
> This is currently converted to a union, even if the same index is used for
> buth subqueries (assuming there is an index on nt:hierarchyNode).
> A workaround is to use:
> {noformat}
> /jcr:root/content//element(*, nt:hierarchyNode)[jcr:contains(., 'abc)
> and (./@jcr:primaryType = 'acme:Page' or ./@jcr:primaryType = 'acme:Asset')]
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5739) Misleading traversal warning for spellcheck queries without index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5739:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Misleading traversal warning for spellcheck queries without index
> -
>
> Key: OAK-5739
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5739
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> In OAK-4313 we avoid traversal for native queries, but we see in some cases
> traversal warnings as follows:
> {noformat}
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.QueryImpl query plan
> [nt:base] as [a] /* traverse "" where (spellcheck([a], 'NothingToFind'))
> and (issamenode([a], [/])) */
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.query.QueryImpl Traversal query (query without
> index):
> select [jcr:path], [jcr:score], [rep:spellcheck()] from [nt:base] as a where
> spellcheck('NothingToFind')
> and issamenode(a, '/')
> /* xpath: /jcr:root
> [rep:spellcheck('NothingToFind')]/(rep:spellcheck()) */;
> consider creating an index
> {noformat}
> This warning is misleading. If no index is available, then either the query
> should fail, or the warning should say that the query result is not correct
> because traversal is used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3919) Properly manage APIs / SPIs intended for public consumption
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-3919:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Properly manage APIs / SPIs intended for public consumption
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-3919
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3919
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
>Reporter: Michael Dürig
>Priority: Major
> Labels: modularization, technical_debt
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> This is a follow up to OAK-3842, which removed package export declarations
> for all packages that we either do not want to be used outside of Oak or that
> are not stable enough yet.
> This issue is to identify those APIs and SPIs of Oak that we actually *want*
> to export and to refactor those such we *can* export them.
> Candidates that are currently used from upstream projects I know of are:
> {code}
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.observation
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.commit
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.spi.state
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.commons
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.lucene
> {code}
> I suggest to create subtask for those we want to go forward with.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7321) Test failure: DocumentNodeStoreIT.modifiedResetWithDiff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-7321:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Test failure: DocumentNodeStoreIT.modifiedResetWithDiff
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-7321
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7321
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration, documentmk
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> No description is provided
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #1295 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #1295|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/1295/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/1295/console]
> {noformat}
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentStoreException: Configured
> cluster node id 1 already in use: machineId/instanceId do not match:
> mac:0242454078e1//home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Jackrabbit
> Oak/oak-store-document !=
> mac:0242d5bcc8f8//home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/Jackrabbit
> Oak/oak-store-document
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.DocumentNodeStoreIT.modifiedResetWithDiff(DocumentNodeStoreIT.java:65)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5858) Lucene index may return the wrong result if path is excluded
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5858?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5858:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Lucene index may return the wrong result if path is excluded
>
>
> Key: OAK-5858
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5858
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lucene
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> If a query uses a Lucene index that has "excludedPaths", the query result may
> be wrong (not contain all matching nodes). This is case even if there is a
> property index available for the queried property. Example:
> {noformat}
> Indexes:
> /oak:index/resourceType/type = "property"
> /oak:index/lucene/type = "lucene"
> /oak:index/lucene/excludedPaths = ["/etc"]
> /oak:index/lucene/indexRules/nt:base/properties/resourceType
> Query:
> /jcr:root/etc//*[jcr:like(@resourceType, "x%y")]
> Index cost:
> cost for /oak:index/resourceType is 1602.0
> cost for /oak:index/lucene is 1001.0
> Result:
> (empty)
> Expected result:
> /etc/a
> /etc/b
> {noformat}
> Here, the lucene index is picked, even thought the query explicitly queries
> for /etc, and the lucene index has this path excluded.
> I think the lucene index should not be picked in case the index does not
> match the query path.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6098) Build timeout
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6098:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Build timeout
> -
>
> Key: OAK-6098
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6098
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
> Labels: CI, jenkins, test-failure
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Jenkins CI failure: https://builds.apache.org/view/J/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #175 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #175|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/175/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/175/console]
> This build timed out on node https://builds.apache.org/computer/H10. Usually
> the build takes around 40mins.
> {code}
> Build timed out (after 60 minutes). Marking the build as failed.
> {code}
> Also timed out on https://builds.apache.org/computer/cassandra5. See
> https://builds.apache.org/view/J/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/208/
> Also timed out on https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu-eu2. See
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/246/
> Also timed out on https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu-2. See
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/267/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6165) Create compound index on _sdType and _sdMaxRevTime (RDB)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6165: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Create compound index on _sdType and _sdMaxRevTime (RDB) > > > Key: OAK-6165 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6165 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: rdbmk >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Assignee: Julian Reschke >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Clone for OAK-6129 for RDB i.e. create index on OAK-6129on _sdType and > _sdMaxRevTime. This is required to run queries issued by the Revision GC > efficiently. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6772) Convert oak-solr-core to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6772: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-solr-core to OSGi R6 annotations > > > Key: OAK-6772 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6772 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: solr >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5792) TarMK: Implement tooling to repair broken nodes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5792:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> TarMK: Implement tooling to repair broken nodes
> ---
>
> Key: OAK-5792
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5792
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: run, segment-tar
>Reporter: Michael Dürig
>Assignee: Andrei Dulceanu
>Priority: Major
> Labels: production, technical_debt, tooling
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> With {{oak-run check}} we can determine the last good revision of a
> repository and use it to manually roll back a corrupted segment store.
> Complementary to this we should implement a tool to roll forward a broken
> revision to a fixed new revision. Such a tool needs to detect which items are
> affected by a corruption and replace these items with markers. With this the
> repository could brought back online and the markers could be used to
> identify the locations in the tree where further manual action might be
> needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6762) Convert oak-blob to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6762: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-blob to OSGi R6 annotations > --- > > Key: OAK-6762 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6762 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: blob >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5776) Build failure: Cannot create directory : Filename too long
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5776: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Build failure: Cannot create directory : Filename too long > -- > > Key: OAK-5776 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5776 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Bug > Components: continuous integration >Reporter: Hudson >Priority: Major > Labels: CI, build-failure, test-failure, windows > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Jenkins Windows CI failure: https://builds.apache.org/job/Oak-Win/ > The build Oak-Win/Windows slaves=Windows,jdk=JDK 1.7 (unlimited security) > 64-bit Windows only,nsfixtures=DOCUMENT_NS,profile=integrationTesting #473 > has failed. > First failed run: [Oak-Win/Windows slaves=Windows,jdk=JDK 1.7 (unlimited > security) 64-bit Windows > only,nsfixtures=DOCUMENT_NS,profile=integrationTesting > #473|https://builds.apache.org/job/Oak-Win/Windows%20slaves=Windows,jdk=JDK%201.7%20(unlimited%20security)%2064-bit%20Windows%20only,nsfixtures=DOCUMENT_NS,profile=integrationTesting/473/] > [console > log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Oak-Win/Windows%20slaves=Windows,jdk=JDK%201.7%20(unlimited%20security)%2064-bit%20Windows%20only,nsfixtures=DOCUMENT_NS,profile=integrationTesting/473/console] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6069) Modularisation of Oak
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6069: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Modularisation of Oak > - > > Key: OAK-6069 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6069 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Epic > Components: core >Reporter: angela >Priority: Major > Labels: modularization > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Epic to track individual steps towards improved modularisation of Oak > Until now Oak modules are all released together, which has some drawbacks. > Work on the modules must be somewhat kept in lockstep. Releasing a fix for a > module means all other modules must be in a state that can be released as > well. For a user it may be desirable to just update a single module to get a > fix and not a complete set of Oak bundles. > The general approach for this epic should be to modularize only as needed and > not split everything. Obvious candidates are stable interfaces like Oak and > NodeStore API and NodeStore implementations. > This requires fixing potential circular dependencies between logical modules > we want to split up. We need a better distinction between the interface part > of the SPI and its implementations. Utilities and commons code must be > reviewed and potentially moved. > The oak-it related dependencies should be reconsidered and that a development > version of a NodeStore implementation can run integration tests. With the > current dependency setup a release of the NodeStore implementation is > required first to run the integration tests with those changes. > Some modules will probably be moved to the top-level and have their own > branches and tags. > To avoid branches it is important to always have trunk stable. Feature work > must happen on feature branches, in a forked module or protected with a > feature flag until it is ready for prime time. No more unstable work in trunk. > Module owner is primarily responsible for module releases. At some point > there won't be a dedicated person anymore responsible for 'the Oak release'. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6759) Convert oak-blob-cloud-azure to OSGi R6 annotations
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6759: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Convert oak-blob-cloud-azure to OSGi R6 annotations > --- > > Key: OAK-6759 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6759 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Technical task > Components: blob-cloud >Reporter: Robert Munteanu >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3336) Abstract a full text index implementation to be extended by Lucene and Solr
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-3336: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Abstract a full text index implementation to be extended by Lucene and Solr > --- > > Key: OAK-3336 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3336 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lucene, query, solr >Reporter: Tommaso Teofili >Assignee: Tommaso Teofili >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Current Lucene and Solr indexes implement quite a no. of features according > to their specific APIs, design and implementation. However in the long run, > while differences in APIs and implementations will / can of course stay, the > difference in design can make it hard to keep those features on par. > It'd be therefore nice to make it possible to abstract as much of design and > implementation bits as possible in an abstract full text implementation which > Lucene and Solr would extend according to their specifics. > An example advantage of this is that index time aggregation will be > implemented only once and therefore any bugfixes and improvements in that > area will be done in the abstract implementation rather than having to do > that in two places. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4934) Query shapes for JCR Query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-4934:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Query shapes for JCR Query
> --
>
> Key: OAK-4934
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4934
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: query
>Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> For certain requirements it would be good to have a notion/support to deduce
> query shape [1]
> {quote}
> A combination of query predicate, sort, and projection specifications.
> For the query predicate, only the structure of the predicate, including the
> field names, are significant; the values in the query predicate are
> insignificant. As such, a query predicate \{ type: 'food' \} is equivalent to
> the query predicate \{ type: 'utensil' \} for a query shape.
> {quote}
> So transforming that to Oak the shape should represent a JCR-SQL2 query
> string (xpath query gets transformed to SQL2) which is a *canonical*
> representation of actual query ignoring the property restriction values.
> Example we have 2 queries
> * SELECT * FROM [app:Asset] AS a WHERE a.[jcr:content/metadata/status] =
> 'published'
> * SELECT * FROM [app:Asset] AS a WHERE a.[jcr:content/metadata/status] =
> 'disabled'
> The query shape would be
> SELECT * FROM [app:Asset] AS a WHERE a.[jcr:content/metadata/status] = 'A'.
> The plan for query having given shape would remain same irrespective of value
> of property restrictions. Path restriction can cause some difference though
> The shape can then be used for
> * Stats Collection - Currently stats collection gets overflown if same query
> with different value gets invoked
> * Allow configuring hints - See support in Mongo [2] for an example. One
> specify via config that for a query of such and such shape this index should
> be used
> * Less noisy diagnostics - If a query gets invoked with bad plan the QE can
> log the warning once instead of logging it for each query invocation
> involving different values.
> [1] https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/glossary/#term-query-shape
> [2] https://docs.mongodb.com/manual/reference/command/planCacheSetFilter/
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5272) Expose BlobStore API to provide information whether blob id is content hashed
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5272: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Expose BlobStore API to provide information whether blob id is content hashed > - > > Key: OAK-5272 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5272 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: blob >Reporter: Amit Jain >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > As per discussion in OAK-5253 it's better to have some information from the > BlobStore(s) whether the blob id can be solely relied upon for comparison. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-3150) Update Lucene to 6.x series
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-3150: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Update Lucene to 6.x series > --- > > Key: OAK-3150 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3150 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lucene >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Assignee: Tommaso Teofili >Priority: Major > Labels: technical_debt > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > We should look into updating the Lucene version to 6.x. Java 8 is the minimum > Java version required > Note this is to be done for trunk only -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7423) Document the proc tree
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7423: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Document the proc tree > -- > > Key: OAK-7423 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7423 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Documentation > Components: segment-tar >Reporter: Francesco Mari >Assignee: Francesco Mari >Priority: Major > Labels: technical_debt > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > The proc tree, contributed in OAK-7416, lacks Javadoc and high-level > documentation. In particular, the exposed content structure should be > described in greater detail. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7998) [DirectBinaryAccess] Verify that binary exists in cloud before creating signed download URI
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7998: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > [DirectBinaryAccess] Verify that binary exists in cloud before creating > signed download URI > --- > > Key: OAK-7998 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7998 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: blob-cloud, blob-cloud-azure >Affects Versions: 1.10.0 >Reporter: Matt Ryan >Assignee: Matt Ryan >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > IIUC, the direct binary access download logic doesn't actually verify that > the requested blob is available in the cloud before creating the signed > download URI. It is possible that a user could request a download URI for a > blob that is "in the repo" but hasn't actually been uploaded yet. > We should verify this by uploading a new blob, preventing it being uploaded > to the cloud (retain in cache), and then request the download URI. We should > get a null back or get some other error or exception; if we get a URI it > would return an HTTP 404 if the blob is not actually uploaded yet (maybe this > would also be ok). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4177) Tests on Mongo should fail if mongo is not available
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-4177:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Tests on Mongo should fail if mongo is not available
>
>
> Key: OAK-4177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4177
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Test
>Reporter: Davide Giannella
>Assignee: Davide Giannella
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Most if not all of the IT/UT that run against mongodb have an
> assumption at class level that if mongodb is not available the tests
> are skipped.
> The tests should fail instead if mongodb is not available and we
> explicitly said that, via the {{nsfixtures}} flags, we want to run the
> tests against mongodb.
> We currently have 4 fixtures/flags: DOCUMENT_NS, SEGMENT_MK,
> DOCUMENT_RDB, MEMORY_NS.
> https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/blob/f957b6787eb7a70eba454ceb1cae90bd4d47f15c/oak-commons/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/commons/FixturesHelper.java#L46
> We may have the need to introduce a new Fixture/Flag that indicate
> that we want to run the tests against Document using the in-memory
> implementation. For example: DOCUMENT_NS_IM.
> This will be useful on the Apache Jenkins as we don't have mongo there
> but we still want to run all the possible Document NS tests against
> the in-memory implementation when this is possible.
> /cc [~mreutegg]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6264) Test failure: IllegalArgumentException during upgrade tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6264?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-6264:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Test failure: IllegalArgumentException during upgrade tests
>
>
> Key: OAK-6264
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6264
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: continuous integration, upgrade
>Reporter: Hudson
>Priority: Major
> Labels: CI, jenkins, test-failure
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> Jenkins CI failure: https://builds.apache.org/view/J/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/
> The build Jackrabbit Oak #338 has failed.
> First failed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
> #338|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/338/] [console
> log|https://builds.apache.org/job/Jackrabbit%20Oak/338/console]
> {noformat}
> javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Failed to copy content
> Stacktrace
> java.lang.RuntimeException: javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Failed to copy
> content
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.CopyCheckpointsTest.prepare(CopyCheckpointsTest.java:141)
> Caused by: javax.jcr.RepositoryException: Failed to copy content
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.CopyCheckpointsTest.prepare(CopyCheckpointsTest.java:141)
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
> at
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.CopyCheckpointsTest.prepare(CopyCheckpointsTest.java:141)
> {noformat}
> This affects
> {noformat}
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.CopyCheckpointsTest.validateMigration[Suppress
> the warning]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.CopyCheckpointsTest.validateMigration[Source
> data store defined, checkpoints migrated]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.IgnoreMissingBinariesTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.UpgradeOldSegmentTest.upgradeFrom10
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentTarToSegmentTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToJdbcTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentTarTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentTarWithMissingDestinationDirectoryTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.SegmentToSegmentWithMissingDestinationDirectoryTest.validateMigration
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, no blobstores defined, segment -> segment]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, no blobstores defined, segment-tar -> segment-tar]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, no blobstores defined, segment -> segment-tar]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> embedded to embedded, no blobstores defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> embedded to external, no blobstores defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> references, src blobstore defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> external to embedded, src blobstore defined]
>
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.CopyBinariesTest.validateMigration[Copy
> external to external, src blobstore defined]
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.FbsToFbsTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.FbsToFdsTest.validateMigration
> org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.upgrade.cli.blob.FdsToFbsTest.validateMigration
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-7725) Allow to have the users and groups created in the immutable part of the composite setup
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-7725: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Allow to have the users and groups created in the immutable part of the > composite setup > --- > > Key: OAK-7725 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7725 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Story > Components: composite, security >Reporter: Tomek Rękawek >Assignee: Tomek Rękawek >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > Attachments: OAK-7725-tests.patch > > > When running the Oak with Composite Node Store, the /home subtree is always > stored in the mutable, global part. Therefore, even if we switch the > immutable part (eg. /libs), the users and groups are not affected. > This setup makes sense for the users and groups created interactively. > However, we also have the service users, which usually are not created > interactively, but are part of the application and therefore are related to > the /libs part. For such users, it'd make sense to include them dynamically, > together with the application, read-only mount. > The proposal is to allow some part of the /home (eg. /home/service) to be > mounted from the read-only partial node store. Let's consider the constraints > we need to put in place (eg. it shouldn't be possible to have inter-mounts > group memberships) and how we can implement this. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5553) Index async index in a new lane without blocking the main lane
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-5553: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Index async index in a new lane without blocking the main lane > -- > > Key: OAK-5553 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5553 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: indexing >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Currently if an async index has to be reindex for any reason say update of > index definition then this process blocks the indexing of other indexes on > that lane. > For e.g. if on "async" lane we have 2 indexes /oak:index/fooIndex and > /oak:index/barIndex and fooIndex needs to be reindexed. In such a case > currently AsyncIndexUpdate would work on reindexing and untill that gets > complete other index do not receive any update. If the reindexing takes say 1 > day then other index would start lagging behind by that time. Note that NRT > indexing would help somewhat here. > To improve this we can implement something similar to what was done for > property index in OAK-1456 i.e. provide a way where > # an admin can trigger reindex of some async indexes > # those indexes are moved to different lane and then reindexed > # post reindexing logic should then move them back to there original lane > Further this task can then be performed on non leader node as the indexes > would not be part of any active lane. Also we may implement it as part of > oak-run -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-8343) Allow queries to be delayed until an index is available
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-8343: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Allow queries to be delayed until an index is available > --- > > Key: OAK-8343 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8343 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lucene, query >Reporter: Thomas Mueller >Assignee: Thomas Mueller >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > Attachments: OAK-8343-b.patch, OAK-8343.patch > > > Currently, indexes are built asynchronously. That is, if an index definition > is added, the index is eventually built, but it's quite hard to say when it > is ready for queries. This can be specially a problem right after the initial > repository initialization, or after an upgrade. > In theory, system startup could be delayed until all indexes are ready (e.g. > set the "reindex" flag for important indexes, and at startup, wait until the > "reindex" flag is set to "false"). However, doing that would block threads > that _don't_ need an index. It would be better to only block threads that > actually do run queries. That would make startup deterministic, without > delaying other threads unnecessarily. > To solve the problem, we can add a property "waitForIndex" in the index > definition (just Lucene indexes is fine for now, as those are the important > asynchronous ones). If set, then queries that potentially use those indexes > are delayed, until the indexes are ready for sure. Reindex would need to > remove that property (the same as it removes e.g. refresh or sets reindex to > false). For added security, queries are only blocked as long as "reindex" is > also set to true (this ensures that waitForIndex is removed eventually), and > waiting should time out after 2 minutes, to ensure the feature doesn't block > startup forever if indexing fails for some reason. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5367) Strange path parsing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5367:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Strange path parsing
>
>
> Key: OAK-5367
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5367
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
> Attachments: JcrPathParserTest.java
>
>
> Incorrect handling of path with "\{" was fixed in OAK-5260, but the behavior
> of the JcrPathParser is still strange. For example:
> * the root node, "/", is mapped to "/", and the current node, "." is mapped
> to "". But "/." is mapped to the current node (should be root node).
> * "/parent/./childA2" is mapped to "/parent/childA2" (which is fine), but
> "/parent/.}/childA2" is also mapped to "/parent/childA2".
> * "\}\{" and "}\[" and "}}[" are mapped to the current node. So are ".[" and
> "/[" and ".}". And "}\{test" is mapped to "}\{test", which is
> inconsistent-weird.
> * "x\[1\]}" is mapped to "x".
> All that weirdness should be resolved. Some seem to be just weird, but some
> look like they could become a problem at some point ("}\{").
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-2538) Support index time aggregation in Solr index
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-2538: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Support index time aggregation in Solr index > > > Key: OAK-2538 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2538 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: solr >Reporter: Tommaso Teofili >Assignee: Tommaso Teofili >Priority: Major > Labels: performance > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > Solr index is only able to do query time aggregation while that "would not > perform well for multi term searches as each term involves a separate call > and with intersection cursor being used the operation might result in reading > up all match terms even when user accesses only first page", therefore it'd > be good to implement index time aggregation like in Lucene index. (/cc > [~chetanm]) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6412) Consider upgrading to newer Lucene versions
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-6412: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Consider upgrading to newer Lucene versions > --- > > Key: OAK-6412 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6412 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: lucene >Reporter: Tommaso Teofili >Assignee: Tommaso Teofili >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > An year ago I had started prototyping the upgrade to Lucene 5 [1], in the > meantime version 6 (and 7 soon) has come out. > I think it'd be very nice to upgrade Lucene version to the latest, this would > give us improvements in space consumption and runtime performance. > In case we want to upgrade to 6.0 or later we need to consider upgrade > scenarios because Lucene Codecs are backward compatible with the previous > major release, so Lucene 6 can read Lucene 5 but not Lucene 4.x (4.7 in our > case) therefore we would need to detect that when reading an index and > trigger reindexing using the new format. > Related to that there's also a patch to upgrade Solr index to version 5 (see > OAK-4318). > [1] : https://github.com/tteofili/jackrabbit-oak/tree/lucene5 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5950) XPath: stack overflow for large combination of "or" and "and"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5950:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> XPath: stack overflow for large combination of "or" and "and"
> -
>
> Key: OAK-5950
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5950
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> The following query returns in a stack overflow:
> {noformat}
> xpath2sql /jcr:root/home//element(*,rep:Authorizable)[(@a1=1 or @a2=1 or
> @a3=1 or @a4=1 or @a5=1 or @a6=1 or @a7=1 or @a8=1)
> and (@b1=1 or @b2=1 or @b3=1 or @b4=1 or @b5=1 or @b6=1 or @b7=1 or @b8=1)
> and (@c1=1 or @c2=1 or @c3=1 or @c4=1 or @c5=1 or @c6=1 or @c7=1 or @c8=1)
> and (@d1=1 or @d2=1 or @d3=1 or @d4=1 or @d5=1 or @d6=1 or @d7=1 or @d8=1)]
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-2787) Faster multi threaded indexing / text extraction for binary content
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2787?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Davide Giannella updated OAK-2787: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0) > Faster multi threaded indexing / text extraction for binary content > --- > > Key: OAK-2787 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2787 > Project: Jackrabbit Oak > Issue Type: Wish > Components: lucene >Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra >Priority: Major > Fix For: 1.16.0 > > > With Lucene based indexing the indexing process is single threaded. This > hamper the indexing of binary content as on a multi processor system only > single thread can be used to perform the indexing > [~ianeboston] Suggested a possible approach [1] involving a 2 phase indexing > # In first phase detect the nodes to be indexed and start the full text > extraction of the binary content. Post extraction save the binary token > stream back to the node as a hidden data. In this phase the node properties > can still be indexed and a marker field would be added to indicate the > fulltext index is still pending > # Later in 2nd phase look for all such Lucene docs and then update them with > the saved token stream > This would allow the text extraction logic to be decouple from Lucene > indexing logic > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/2w5o4bwqsosb6esu -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-5980) Bad Join Query Plan Used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella updated OAK-5980:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.14.0)
> Bad Join Query Plan Used
>
>
> Key: OAK-5980
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5980
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: query
>Reporter: Thomas Mueller
>Assignee: Thomas Mueller
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>
> For a join query, where selectors are joined over ischildnode but also can
> use an index,
> the selectors sometimes use the index instead of the much less
> expensive parent join. Example:
> {noformat}
> select [a].* from [nt:unstructured] as [a]
> inner join [nt:unstructured] as [b] on ischildnode([b], [a])
> inner join [nt:unstructured] as [c] on ischildnode([c], [b])
> inner join [nt:unstructured] as [d] on ischildnode([d], [c])
> inner join [nt:unstructured] as [e] on ischildnode([e], [d])
> where [a].[classname] = 'letter'
> and isdescendantnode([a], '/content')
> and [c].[classname] = 'chapter'
> and localname([b]) = 'chapters'
> and [e].[classname] = 'list'
> and localname([d]) = 'lists'
> and [e].[path] = cast('/content/abc' as path)
> {noformat}
> The order of selectors is sometimes wrong (not e, d, c, b, a), but
> more importantly, selectors c and a use the index on className.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
