[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13809367#comment-13809367
 ] 

angela edited comment on OAK-1126 at 10/30/13 5:30 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------

as discussed today in the oak-meeting: i tried it out to see if OAK would 
really work with the corresponding descriptor enabled. attached a patch that 
shows the effect and includes some extra tests (could not find the tests in the 
TCK).


was (Author: anchela):
as discussed today in the oak-meeting: i tried it out to see if OAK would 
really work with the corresponding descriptor enabled. the attached a patch 
that shows the effect and includes some extra tests (could not find the tests 
in the TCK).

> Same node and property name support
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1126
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1126
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: core, doc, jcr
>            Reporter: Tobias Bocanegra
>         Attachments: OAK-1126.patch
>
>
> The initial MK abstraction mandated that the nodes and properties share the 
> same namespace 
> (http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RepositoryMicroKernel#Data%20Model). This 
> is a regression from Jackrabbit 2.x, which supports same name nodes and 
> properties (SNNP).
> OTOH, the NodeStores can easily support SNNP and with proper escaping, the 
> MKs can also support it.
> We should try to keep the support for SNNP in order to keep backward 
> compatibility for existing content, and also keep the support for importing 
> XML documents with same attribute and element names.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to