[jira] [Commented] (OAK-2683) the "hitting the observation queue limit" problem

2015-11-27 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029683#comment-15029683 ] Michael Dürig commented on OAK-2683: I implemented [something along this

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-2683) the "hitting the observation queue limit" problem

2015-11-27 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029640#comment-15029640 ] Carsten Ziegeler commented on OAK-2683: --- With SLING-4751 we have a new way for resource observation in

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-2683) the "hitting the observation queue limit" problem

2015-11-27 Thread Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029663#comment-15029663 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-2683: Nice.. didn't remember about that one. But, I still think that an

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-2683) the "hitting the observation queue limit" problem

2015-11-26 Thread Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15028940#comment-15028940 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-2683: [~egli], as far as I understand, the underlying cause would

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-2683) the "hitting the observation queue limit" problem

2015-11-26 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029009#comment-15029009 ] Stefan Egli commented on OAK-2683: -- [~catholicon], right, I think the trigger of observation queue problems

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-2683) the "hitting the observation queue limit" problem

2015-11-26 Thread Vikas Saurabh (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029021#comment-15029021 ] Vikas Saurabh commented on OAK-2683: bq. if that's not the current diff-cache already Current cache