[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14905987#comment-14905987
]
Stefan Egli commented on OAK-3251:
--
bq. possible improvements in DocumentDiscoveryLiteServiceTest
I've
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14906365#comment-14906365
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-3251:
---
I think then we can consider this issue as resolved. We did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14906643#comment-14906643
]
angela commented on OAK-3251:
-
[~tripod] created that test. so, from the top of my head i probably know less
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14905217#comment-14905217
]
Tommaso Teofili commented on OAK-3251:
--
bq. would that be fine for you if we move QueryJcrTest of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14734312#comment-14734312
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-3251:
---
The upgrade related tests are slow because sessions are still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14730655#comment-14730655
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-3251:
--
bq. org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.query.QueryJcrTest
Should be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14730517#comment-14730517
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-3251:
---
[~chetanm]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=14728926#comment-14728926
]
Alex Parvulescu commented on OAK-3251:
--
+1 looks good
> speeding up the build time
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14710742#comment-14710742
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-3251:
---
VersionGarbageCollectorTest is now an IT. See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14704453#comment-14704453
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-3251:
---
If I remember correctly it was agreed to run
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14704466#comment-14704466
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-3251:
---
I share Julian's view. A plain {{mvn clean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14704732#comment-14704732
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-3251:
---
[~alex.parvulescu] would you agree as well?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14704702#comment-14704702
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3251:
-
FWIW, I just improved BasicDocumentStoreTest not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14702933#comment-14702933
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-3251:
---
Didn't look at the actual code yet so a full
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14702912#comment-14702912
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-3251:
Some of those should probably be ITs instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14702943#comment-14702943
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-3251:
I'd be fine with moving the segment tests to ITs.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14702939#comment-14702939
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3251:
-
I'm not convinced. I'd prefer that a regular unit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14703094#comment-14703094
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-3251:
---
[~reschke] are you referring to the Fixture
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14703106#comment-14703106
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3251:
-
...the fixture. I can see why higher-level
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14702675#comment-14702675
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-3251:
---
When running a simple clean install, only the
20 matches
Mail list logo
