[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-27 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14716532#comment-14716532 ] Stefan Egli commented on OAK-3288: -- replaced that usage of set(,Map) with setMapEntry() in

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14712915#comment-14712915 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3288: - If we wanted to change the signature for set()

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Marcel Reutegger (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14712969#comment-14712969 ] Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-3288: --- bq. I also see a case where a Map is set

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14713401#comment-14713401 ] Stefan Egli commented on OAK-3288: -- PS: until OAK-3288 is there I had to do an ugly

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14713635#comment-14713635 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3288: - [~egli]? clarify DocumentStore contract with

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14713657#comment-14713657 ] Stefan Egli commented on OAK-3288: -- could do indeed yes - let's see what the outcome of

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14713633#comment-14713633 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3288: - You could treat them both as java.lang.Number

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14713648#comment-14713648 ] Stefan Egli commented on OAK-3288: -- are you referring to

[jira] [Commented] (OAK-3288) clarify DocumentStore contract with respect to number formats

2015-08-26 Thread Julian Reschke (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14714179#comment-14714179 ] Julian Reschke commented on OAK-3288: - [~mreutegg] so if we want to restrict the types