[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346743#comment-16346743
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7223:
---
The warn message you added in the cache loader will not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-7226:
--
Affects Version/s: 1.8.0
> Warn messages ignoring exception parameter
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346754#comment-16346754
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7223:
---
See OAK-7226 for the warn messages.
> Files could be kept
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346826#comment-16346826
]
Oliver Lietz commented on OAK-7203:
---
+1 for moving {{MountInfoProviderService}} to {{oak-core}}
> Make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346838#comment-16346838
]
Oliver Lietz commented on OAK-7203:
---
[~stillalex], it's ugly main class (those methods are not required,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346685#comment-16346685
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7182:
--
Here's the list of APIs I (semi-manually) extracted from oak as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346749#comment-16346749
]
Hudson commented on OAK-7221:
-
Previously failing build now is OK.
Passed run: [Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346949#comment-16346949
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7188:
-
a) I don't see how, if the test is supposed to run with Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomek Rękawek updated OAK-6922:
---
Description:
An Azure Blob Storage implementation of the segment storage, based on the
OAK-6921 work.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-7221.
---
Resolution: Duplicate
The log doesn't contain any failed tests, but judging from the build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346878#comment-16346878
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7213:
---
Thanks for the review. I added an additional assertion to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346672#comment-16346672
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7182:
--
I am looking into the Guava packaging and release policy, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346741#comment-16346741
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-7223:
Thanks [~mreutegg] for the review. Yes makes sense and I am in the process
Marcel Reutegger created OAK-7226:
-
Summary: Warn messages ignoring exception parameter
Key: OAK-7226
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7226
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346875#comment-16346875
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-5506:
-
...was just looking at the last columns. Will rerun later with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346726#comment-16346726
]
Marcel Reutegger edited comment on OAK-7223 at 1/31/18 12:24 PM:
-
I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger closed OAK-7221.
-
> Build Jackrabbit Oak #1212 failed
> -
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346776#comment-16346776
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-7226:
--
[~mreutegg] This is a "feature" of slf4j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346786#comment-16346786
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-5506:
---
The result doesn't look that useful. The measured time is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346806#comment-16346806
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7226:
---
Hmm, now I'm confused. How can slf4j do that? Isn't this up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Dürig updated OAK-7194:
---
Issue Type: Improvement (was: Bug)
> Threads are going in blocked state - OAK segment
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger reassigned OAK-7198:
-
Assignee: Marcel Reutegger
> Index rule with REGEX_ALL_PROPS includes relative node
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346962#comment-16346962
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-5506:
-
With respect to performance: this code change opens the door to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16345030#comment-16345030
]
Andrei Dulceanu edited comment on OAK-7162 at 1/31/18 3:01 PM:
---
Fixed in trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346920#comment-16346920
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-7188:
-
[^OAK-7188.diff] uses the proper method using reflection and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-7188:
Attachment: OAK-7188.diff
> guava: ListenableFuture.transform() changes to transformAsync in version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7188?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346932#comment-16346932
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7188:
Can't we have a stable test dependency to Guava? If not, I'd prefer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346957#comment-16346957
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-5506:
-
With respect to compatibility with segment-tar storage written by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346726#comment-16346726
]
Marcel Reutegger commented on OAK-7223:
---
I would implement the new utility method slightly different.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346825#comment-16346825
]
Chetan Mehrotra commented on OAK-7226:
--
Logback also supports it [1]
[1]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346825#comment-16346825
]
Chetan Mehrotra edited comment on OAK-7226 at 1/31/18 1:33 PM:
---
Logback also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-7223:
--
Attachment: OAK-7223-3.patch
> Files could be kept partially in case of disconnection from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-7226.
---
Resolution: Invalid
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.10)
I see, thanks for the pointer.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger resolved OAK-7198.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.9.0
Thanks for the review. Applied the patch to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcel Reutegger updated OAK-7198:
--
Labels: candidate_oak_1_8 (was: )
> Index rule with REGEX_ALL_PROPS includes relative node
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16347006#comment-16347006
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-5506:
Agree wrt. performance. In other places we already switched to byte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela resolved OAK-7228.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
:-)
> Potential long overflow in MountPermissionProvider.getNumEntries
>
Alex Deparvu created OAK-7227:
-
Summary: MountPermissionProvider getNumEntries prone to overflow
Key: OAK-7227
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7227
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
angela updated OAK-7228:
Description:
[~stillalex], just came across {{MountPermissionProvider.getNumEntries}}, which
looks as follows:
angela created OAK-7228:
---
Summary: Potential long overflow in
MountPermissionProvider.getNumEntries
Key: OAK-7228
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7228
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16347034#comment-16347034
]
angela commented on OAK-7227:
-
see OAK-7228 for a proposed (but untested) patch :)
> MountPermissionProvider
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Deparvu updated OAK-7227:
--
Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement)
> MountPermissionProvider getNumEntries prone to overflow
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Alex Deparvu resolved OAK-7227.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.8.2
applied patch provided on OAK-7228 with
Amit Jain created OAK-7223:
--
Summary: Files could be kept partially in case of disconnection
from backends
Key: OAK-7223
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346620#comment-16346620
]
Andrei Dulceanu commented on OAK-6373:
--
[~frm], thanks for reviewing!
Fixed in trunk at r1822791.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346619#comment-16346619
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-7223:
[~mreutegg] Could you please review the patch.
> Files could be kept
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Jain updated OAK-7223:
---
Attachment: OAK-7223.patch
> Files could be kept partially in case of disconnection from backends
>
Davide Giannella created OAK-7225:
-
Summary: Replace AtomicCounter Supplier
Key: OAK-7225
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7225
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Sub-task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346625#comment-16346625
]
Robert Munteanu commented on OAK-7203:
--
Thinking about this a bit more, I think the current setup is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346628#comment-16346628
]
Davide Giannella commented on OAK-7182:
---
I've added a subtask about the AtomicCounter aspect and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7203?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346629#comment-16346629
]
Alex Deparvu commented on OAK-7203:
---
bq. bind/unbind removed additionally
could you explain why this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346637#comment-16346637
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-6373:
Looking at the usage output of {{check}}:
{noformat}
--checkpoints
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-5506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346638#comment-16346638
]
Julian Reschke commented on OAK-5506:
-
results from {{java -jar target/oak-benchmarks-1.10-SNAPSHOT.jar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Jain updated OAK-7223:
---
Attachment: OAK-7223-2.patch
> Files could be kept partially in case of disconnection from backends
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346656#comment-16346656
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-7223:
Added a 2nd version as needed to bump the package version also.
> Files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomek Rękawek updated OAK-6922:
---
Summary: Azure support for the segment-tar (was: HDFS support for the
segment-tar)
> Azure support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomek Rękawek updated OAK-6921:
---
Description:
h3. Rationale
segment-tar, as names suggest, stores the segments in a bunch of tar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomek Rękawek updated OAK-6922:
---
Description:
An Azure Blob Storage implementation of the segment storage, based on the
OAK-6921 work.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Davide Giannella reopened OAK-7162:
---
> Race condition on revisions head between compaction and scheduler could
> result in skipped
Andrei Dulceanu created OAK-7224:
Summary: oak-run check should have an option to check the segments
checksums
Key: OAK-7224
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7224
Project: Jackrabbit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346604#comment-16346604
]
Francesco Mari commented on OAK-6373:
-
[~dulceanu], the latest commit in your branch looks good to me.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tomek Rękawek updated OAK-6922:
---
Comment: was deleted
(was: https://github.com/trekawek/jackrabbit-oak/tree/segment-tar/hdfs)
> Azure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346521#comment-16346521
]
Michael Dürig commented on OAK-7162:
Reopened since backport to 1.8 is still pending.
> Race condition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrei Dulceanu updated OAK-7224:
-
Description:
{{oak-run check}} does currently *not* check the checksums of the segments. As
a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16346566#comment-16346566
]
Valentin Olteanu commented on OAK-7224:
---
If this is a completely different type of check, e.g. only
Hudson created OAK-7229:
---
Summary: Build Jackrabbit Oak #1218 failed
Key: OAK-7229
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7229
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amit Jain updated OAK-7223:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.9.0
> Files could be kept partially in case of disconnection from backends
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-7223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16348147#comment-16348147
]
Amit Jain commented on OAK-7223:
On trunk with http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1822850=rev
> Files could
68 matches
Mail list logo
