[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-3986) simple performance regression IT (that would fail in case commitRoots would not be purged)

2016-02-12 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stefan Egli resolved OAK-3986.
--
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.4)
   1.3.16

reactivated test in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1729806=rev and 
travis looks happy. Closing therefore.

> simple performance regression IT (that would fail in case commitRoots would 
> not be purged)
> --
>
> Key: OAK-3986
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3986
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: jcr
>Affects Versions: 1.3.15
>Reporter: Stefan Egli
>Assignee: Stefan Egli
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.3.16
>
>
> There should be a performance regression IT that measures a couple of 
> addNode/removeNode/setProperties on a particular node to ensure performance 
> remains constant over time. Such a test pattern used to show a degradation 
> over time due to OAK-1794 but got fixed in OAK-2528 long time ago. This is 
> just to have a proper IT.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-3986) simple performance regression IT (that would fail in case commitRoots would not be purged)

2016-02-08 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stefan Egli resolved OAK-3986.
--
Resolution: Fixed

test modified in rev 1729174 as follows:
* margin was erroneously at 20% - adjusted that to the intended 50% (we can go 
higher if this still doesn't turn out enough for travis)
* ignoring first failing iteration (which effectively would allow one 
performance-slowdown-spike)
* increased number of loops from 10 to 15 to ensure the above relaxed test 
parameters dont unintentionally result in missing a failing test run

> simple performance regression IT (that would fail in case commitRoots would 
> not be purged)
> --
>
> Key: OAK-3986
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3986
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: jcr
>Affects Versions: 1.3.15
>Reporter: Stefan Egli
>Assignee: Stefan Egli
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.3.16
>
>
> There should be a performance regression IT that measures a couple of 
> addNode/removeNode/setProperties on a particular node to ensure performance 
> remains constant over time. Such a test pattern used to show a degradation 
> over time due to OAK-1794 but got fixed in OAK-2528 long time ago. This is 
> just to have a proper IT.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-3986) simple performance regression IT (that would fail in case commitRoots would not be purged)

2016-02-04 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Stefan Egli resolved OAK-3986.
--
Resolution: Fixed

> simple performance regression IT (that would fail in case commitRoots would 
> not be purged)
> --
>
> Key: OAK-3986
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3986
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>  Issue Type: Test
>  Components: jcr
>Affects Versions: 1.3.15
>Reporter: Stefan Egli
>Assignee: Stefan Egli
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.3.16
>
>
> There should be a performance regression IT that measures a couple of 
> addNode/removeNode/setProperties on a particular node to ensure performance 
> remains constant over time. Such a test pattern used to show a degradation 
> over time due to OAK-1794 but got fixed in OAK-2528 long time ago. This is 
> just to have a proper IT.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)