Re: [oauth] Re: 2-legged OAuth -- why it's great, what it's missing

2010-02-03 Thread John Joseph Bachir
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:11 PM, John Kristian jmkrist...@gmail.com wrote: In theory, a service provider could handle a change of consumer credentials, and continue to accept access tokens that it issued to that consumer previously. But that seems dangerous. If the consumer credentials were

[oauth] Re: 2-legged OAuth -- why it's great, what it's missing

2010-02-01 Thread John Joseph Bachir
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 5:32 PM, John Joseph Bachir johnjosephbac...@gmail.com wrote: I realize that this wasn't one of the goals of OAuth, and on a service-by-service basis it seems reasonable for the onus of security and data-management to be Hit the save button too soon on that -- was

[oauth] Re: 2-legged OAuth -- why it's great, what it's missing

2010-02-01 Thread John Kristian
In theory, a service provider could handle a change of consumer credentials, and continue to accept access tokens that it issued to that consumer previously. But that seems dangerous. If the consumer credentials were revealed to an attacker, it seems likely that access tokens and secrets were also