[oauth] Re: OAuth Security Issue: Referer

2009-04-24 Thread Allen Tom
The HTTP Referrer check won't work if the Consumer's domain is a social networking site, and the attacker posted the authorization link to the victim's wall. Allen Manger, James H wrote: > A (temporary) fix might be for Service Providers to check the HTTP > Referer request header when Users a

[oauth] Re: OAuth Security Issue: Referer

2009-04-24 Thread Dossy Shiobara
On 4/24/09 3:25 AM, Manger, James H wrote: > A (temporary) fix might be for Service Providers to check the HTTP > Referer request header when Users arrives at the authorization URI. This is a non-starter as users behind anonymizing web proxies are screwed. -- Dossy Shiobara | do...

[oauth] Re: OAuth Security Issue: Referer

2009-04-24 Thread Zhihong
This is good suggestion for specific consumers. I think we might be able to use it for our internal consumers. However, it's a challenge to figure out valid referrer for a consumer. Some of our consumers have multiple domains (yes, they all share the same consumer key). Zhihong On Apr 24, 3:25 

[oauth] Re: OAuth Security Issue: Referer

2009-04-24 Thread Manger, James H
From: oauth@googlegroups.com [oa...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Josh Fraser [joshf...@gmail.com] Sent: 24 April 2009 17:41 To: OAuth Subject: [oauth] Re: OAuth Security Issue: Referer It's a good idea. The problem is that it's trivial to fake a referrer header. All you need to do is

[oauth] Re: OAuth Security Issue: Referer

2009-04-24 Thread Josh Fraser
It's a good idea. The problem is that it's trivial to fake a referrer header. All you need to do is tinyurl a link (to avoid suspicion) that redirects you to the authorization url via a proxy that adds the expected referrer header. On Apr 24, 1:25 am, "Manger, James H" wrote: > A (temporary)