Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope - Coming to a Consensus

2010-05-01 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
Am 01.05.2010 03:07, schrieb Marius Scurtescu: On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Torsten Lodderstedt tors...@lodderstedt.net wrote: In my opinion, automatic discovery on scope values is as valuable or not valuable as automatic discovery for a service API. I would like to echo one of my

Re: [OAUTH-WG] application/x-www-form-urlencoded vs JSON

2010-05-01 Thread Robert Sayre
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav e...@hueniverse.com wrote: If we end up with JSON as the only *core* format, we can still extend the protocol in another spec to add a format request parameter with other serializations. I think that's the right way to look at it. The fact

Re: [OAUTH-WG] 'Scope' parameter proposal

2010-05-01 Thread Luke Shepard
I'm intrigued by the idea of returning scopes in the 403 response to a resource. I'll see if we can provide a working example of it. On Apr 23, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Brian Eaton wrote: On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Manger, James H james.h.man...@team.telstra.com wrote: We mustn't drop

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Scope - Coming to a Consensus

2010-05-01 Thread Dick Hardt
On 2010-05-01, at 3:48 PM, Luke Shepard wrote: I agree with approach #3. As for the delimiter, I'm fine if the spec wants to do space-delimited. Just FYI Facebook will also continue to support and document commas in addition to whatever the spec says, because spaces are typically