[OAUTH-WG] OAuth JWT Bearer Token Profile

2011-03-16 Thread Mike Jones
I've just published an OAuth JWT Bearer Token Profilehttp://self-issued.info/docs/draft-jones-oauth-jwt-bearer.html. It defines a means of using a JSON Web Token (JWT) bearer token to request an OAuth 2.0 access token. This profile is intentionally strongly based upon the SAML 2.0 Bearer

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC on draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.txt

2011-03-16 Thread Justin Richer
Overall this is in good shape. Some points: Mutual cross-reference between the MAC and Bearer specs might help people trying to decide what kind of OAuth token to use. 2.3 The parameter name oauth_token is already taken by OAuth 1.0 and should NOT be re-used here. Suggest changing it to

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Reminder: Prague IETF Meeting: Soliciting OAuth WG Presentations

2011-03-16 Thread Torsten Lodderstedt
pls. add a presentation about the security document/considerations to the agenda Am 15.03.2011 20:52, schrieb Hannes Tschofenig: A reminder to send me your presentation request. On Mar 14, 2011, at 9:13 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: Hi all, the IETF meeting in Prague is just around the

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC on draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.txt

2011-03-16 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
-Original Message- From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Justin Richer Mutual cross-reference between the MAC and Bearer specs might help people trying to decide what kind of OAuth token to use. Speaking for MAC - over my dead body :-) EHL

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC on draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-03.txt

2011-03-16 Thread Justin Richer
Mutual cross-reference between the MAC and Bearer specs might help people trying to decide what kind of OAuth token to use. Speaking for MAC - over my dead body :-) Now now, that's just not nice. :) ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC on draft-ietf-oauth-v2-13.txt

2011-03-16 Thread Justin Richer
Many of my comments have probably been covered by other folks on the list, but I'm going to repeat things along here anyway: Preamble: Does this document actually obsolete 5849? Since OAuth2 is explicitly not backwards compatible, is this WG really making the claim that we're updating OAuth,

[OAUTH-WG] Method of validating client id client secret for authenticated requests?

2011-03-16 Thread Steve Hoeksema
Hi all, I'm evaluating whether OAuth 2 draft 13 w/ MAC authentication will be suitable for my situation. We have an API which will be consumed by approved native apps on mobile devices. For business reasons I want to ensure that a user cannot use their own valid access token to make API calls

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Method of validating client id client secret for authenticated requests?

2011-03-16 Thread Manger, James H
Steve, I'm evaluating whether OAuth 2 draft 13 w/ MAC authentication will be suitable for my situation. ... I want to ensure that a user cannot use their own valid access token to make API calls from non-approved clients. ... I'm aware that determined users could extract the client ID

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Method of validating client id client secret for authenticated requests?

2011-03-16 Thread Eran Hammer-Lahav
OAuth 2 intentionally dropped the use of client credentials when making protected resource requests. This seems to be your main issue. If you are going to use MAC tokens, one easy solution is to tell your developers to simply concatenate the client secret with the token secret when signing the