Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-01-19 Thread Phil Hunt
+1 to Mike and John’s comments. Phil > On Jan 19, 2019, at 12:34 PM, Mike Jones > wrote: > > I also agree that “resource” should be a specific network-addressable URL > whereas a separate audience parameter (like “aud” in JWTs) can refer to one > or more logical resources. They are

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-01-19 Thread Mike Jones
I also agree that “resource” should be a specific network-addressable URL whereas a separate audience parameter (like “aud” in JWTs) can refer to one or more logical resources. They are different, if related, things. Note that the ACE WG is proposing to register a logical audience parameter

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-oauth-resource-indicators-01

2019-01-19 Thread John Bradley
We need to decide if we want to make a change. For security we are location centric. I prefer to keep resource location separate from logical audience that can be a scope or other parameter. If becomes harder for people to use the parameter correctly if we are too flexible. I would rather have

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2019-01-19 Thread Brian Campbell
This response is slow but somewhat less slow than those that came before. So I also apologize again but somewhat less so :) I do apologize for sending on a weekend but I just wasn't able to finish and make it to the "send" button before the end of my Friday. I've endeavored to continue the