[OAUTH-WG] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-17: (with COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-17: Yes When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to htt

[OAUTH-WG] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-17: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-17: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer t

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Adam, I went ahead and assumed that your silence constituted acceptance of the proposal to use RFC6749's Appendix B. on the "Use of application/x-www-form-urlencoded Media Type" as a citation for the media type. So I added that bit and also fixed the other nits you identified in -17 https://tools.

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ben, It took more time than expected but the early registry allocations have been approved and completed. They can all be found (qualified as 'TEMPORARY') at https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters and https://www.iana.org/assignments/jwt I've also published draft -17 of the document ht

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Alissa Cooper's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alissa, Having not heard anything more on the issue, I went ahead and made those changes to the Privacy Consideration section. I believe they address the question/concern in your DISCUSS ballot. As such, I'd respectfully request that you review the changes and clear the discuss. Thank you, Brian

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-17.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Token Exchange Authors : Michael B. Jones Anthony Nadalin

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

-- DISCUSS: -- Thanks for everyone who worked to get this document out the door. I found it to be well-organized and easy to read. -

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bcp-06: (with COMMENT)

-- COMMENT: -- Hello, thank you for this document. I wonder whether [nist-sp-800-56a-r3] should be a normative reference. Thanks -m Correct, as it is used

[OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8252 (5776)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8252, "OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps". -- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5776 -- Type: Editorial Reported by: Jan Dziekan Secti