Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8252 (5776)

2019-07-07 Thread William Denniss
This is an issue with the HTML auto generation, not the normative document. I believe this errata should be rejected. William On Fri, 5 Jul 2019 at 06:56, RFC Errata System wrote: > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8252, > "OAuth 2.0 for Native Apps". > >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Benjamin Kaduk's Yes on draft-ietf-oauth-token-exchange-17: (with COMMENT)

2019-07-07 Thread Brian Campbell
On Sat, Jul 6, 2019 at 2:42 PM Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > > Not to my recollection. I'm honestly not even sure what an array would > mean > > for "may_act". Do you mean for "act"? > > Currently we can say that ad...@example.com "may act" as u...@example.com.. > But IIUC we don't have a way to say