Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC on Pushed Authorization Requests draft

A couple of WGLC comments from my sphere. I'd like to take the discussion of the first item in https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/iD33QbZTj92LJ6M9wNUq9s3nLpA/ as a suggestion that the top part of section 2.1 be reworked

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC on Pushed Authorization Requests draft

Thanks Joseph. We'll get those niggles addressed. And it's great to hear the positive implementation and testing info. On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 6:08 PM Joseph Heenan wrote: > Thanks Rifaat, Hannes, and also thanks to all the authors. > > I’ve been through the latest spec and it basically looks