Re: [OAUTH-WG] Updated shepherd writeup for draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-09

2020-09-22 Thread Vittorio Bertocci
Thanks to both! I agree this can use more clarity. I am modifying the figure as in the following, adopting a style closer to 6.1 of 7519 and providing a more descriptive caption. Header: {"typ":"at+JWT","alg":"RS256","kid":"RjEwOwOA"} Claims: { "iss":

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-08 question

2020-09-22 Thread Guilherme Kun
Please remove my email from the conversation Em ter., 22 de set. de 2020 às 03:25, Deepak Tiwari < deepak.tiw...@intigate.in> escreveu: > Please remove my email from the conversation > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:39 AM Logan Widick > wrote: > >> If I understand "The intent would be to present

Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-access-token-jwt-08 question

2020-09-22 Thread Deepak Tiwari
Please remove my email from the conversation On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:39 AM Logan Widick wrote: > If I understand "The intent would be to present that information in the > same way you would when querying a users/, encoded in claims" correctly, > the "roles", "groups", and "entitlements"