Hi all,
thank you for your valuable feedback on the last draft version. Daniel
and I tried to address all comments in the new version.
Changes in -02:
* Incorporated WG feedback
* Clarifications for unique issuer identifier
* Clarifications when multiple issuer identifier could be present
Thanks Vladimir and Takahiko, we incorporated your proposals into the
next version of the draft.
-Daniel
Am 17.11.20 um 08:56 schrieb Vladimir Dzhuvinov:
>
> Noting two unrelated comments that came up:
>
> 1. The iss value in the example doesn't appear to be URL encoded:
>
>
>
Hi @all,
I have recently started looking at OAuth2.1 spec and I proposed
to align the terminology with the HTTP spec:
- https://github.com/aaronpk/oauth-v2-1/pull/22
I suspect that more work on this field would improve the spec, eg:
-