I've addressed the review comments on the dpop_jkt PR
https://github.com/danielfett/draft-dpop/pull/89/ in commit
https://github.com/danielfett/draft-dpop/pull/89/commits/6e0ff26e9aa2bf9bf1aacf9ba2ce29de0c032004.
Specifically, the commit:
* Specifies that SHA-256 is used for the JWK
Hi Roman,
We've received a request to move ahead with this OAuth Parameter registration
without approval from Hannes (see below). As the AD for this document, can you
approve?
The document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp
thanks,
Amanda
On Mon Jan 24
Maybe we should come up with an alternative process that doesn't involve a
single person sign-off. Is there a reason we need a "designated expert"?
Since no one on this thread has objected, I think it is fair to say, we
don't need Hannes to sign-off. We should get this added.
Amanda, please
Hi Hannes,
As the designated expert for OAuth Parameters, can you sign off on this
registration?
thanks,
Amanda
On Thu Jan 13 21:29:54 2022, bcampb...@pingidentity.com wrote:
> Indeed, I believe that is exactly what the registration request in the
> draft asks to do
>
+1. I support adoption.
From: OAuth On Behalf Of George Fletcher
Sent: Friday 21 January 2022 21:22
To: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef ; oauth
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption - JWK Thumbprint URI
+1 for adoption
On 1/13/22 9:26 AM, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote:
All,
This is a call for
