A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF.
Title : OAuth 2.0 Demonstrating Proof-of-Possession at the
Application Layer (DPoP)
Authors : Daniel
Hi,
On 2022-6-2, at 10:09, Lars Eggert wrote:
> This looks like a tooling issue.
I opened https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/4048
Thanks,
Lars
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
OAuth mailing list
Yes, we submitted both the .xml and .txt files. It does sound like a tooling
issue. I'm sure the RFC Editor will sort it out before publication.
Thanks again,
-- Mike
-Original Message-
From: Lars Eggert
Sent: Thursday,
Hi,
On 2022-6-2, at 5:22, Kristina Yasuda wrote:
> Regarding your reference to the Simplified BSD License, could you please
> clarify what you meant since
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-02.html
> does refer to the Revised BSD License? There doesn't seem
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 11:31 PM Mike Jones
wrote:
> I hear you about the BCP 14 usage, but at the same time, I think that the
> (single) use of MUST is appropriate. Furthermore, its usage there was
> suggested to us by Roman in his AD review. Therefore, I'm prone to leave
> it as is.
>
Fine
Hi Murray,
I hear you about the BCP 14 usage, but at the same time, I think that the
(single) use of MUST is appropriate. Furthermore, its usage there was
suggested to us by Roman in his AD review. Therefore, I'm prone to leave it as
is.
All the best,
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-oauth-jwk-thumbprint-uri-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
