Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Cross-Device Flows

I support adoption of this document too. Kristina From: OAuth On Behalf Of Aaron Parecki Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 5:16 PM To: OAuth WG Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Cross-Device Flows I support adoption of this document. Aaron On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:52 AM Mike

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Cross-Device Flows

I support adoption of this document. Aaron On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 7:52 AM Mike Jones wrote: > I support adoption of the cross-device flows document. > > > >-- Mike > > > > *From:* OAuth *On Behalf Of * Joseph Heenan > *Sent:* Wednesday,

[OAUTH-WG] OAuth WG Virtual Office Hours is cancelled for today

All, Hannes and I have a conflict today, and we will not be able to host the OAuth WG Virtual Office Hours meeting. Regards, Rifaat ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Cross-Device Flows

I support adoption of the cross-device flows document. -- Mike From: OAuth On Behalf Of Joseph Heenan Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2022 4:34 AM To: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Cross-Device Flows Hi all I support

[OAUTH-WG] Need to speak with some one asap I have a security issue and have apparently been robbed and the only guy had any of my Info has done it more than once

Brandon Whitacre Holdings LLC Cryptic Codes LLC Brandon Whitacre ___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP questions (post IETF 115), part 1

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 5:18 PM Dmitry Telegin wrote: > > To sum up, my idea is that in cases when we can unambiguously establish > the scheme used, we should include error info into the corresponding > challenge only. In cases of ambiguity, both challenges should be used to > deliver error

[OAUTH-WG] (no subject)

___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Cross-Device Flows

Hi all I support adoption of this document. Thanks Joseph > On 15 Nov 2022, at 14:43, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > > All, > > During the IETF meeting last week, there was a strong support for the > adoption of the following document as a WG document: >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP questions (post IETF 115), part 2

Hi Dmitry Yes, the OpenID Foundation conformance suite will include tests for DPoP as part of the FAPI2 test suite. The tests already exist and can be run, but they are not yet complete (some negative tests are missing, nonces are not yet supported, etc). If you (or anyone else) would like to

[OAUTH-WG] (no subject)

___ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

[OAUTH-WG] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15

Reviewer: Carl Wallace Review result: Has Nits Comments/questions - Section 2.2 states "When different common data fields are used in combination, the permissions the client requests are the cartesian product of the values." What would that mean for the example in Figure 7 where geolocation is

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Tuesday side meeting agenda

Thanks again Brandon Whitacre Holdings LLC Cryptic Codes LLCBrandon Whitacre On Nov 16, 2022, at 02:37, Kai Lehmann wrote: Hi Rifaat,   the ones regarding the Fine Grained Authorization discussion.   Regards, Kai   From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Date: Tuesday, 15. November 2022 at 20:45 To:

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Tuesday side meeting agenda

Brandon Whitacre Holdings LLC Cryptic Codes LLCBrandon Whitacre On Nov 16, 2022, at 02:37, Kai Lehmann wrote: Hi Rifaat,   the ones regarding the Fine Grained Authorization discussion.   Regards, Kai   From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef Date: Tuesday, 15. November 2022 at 20:45 To: Kai Lehmann