Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP questions (post IETF 115), part 1

2022-11-17 Thread Brian Campbell
Either way is okay. But straight to GitHub with a PR is probably easier https://github.com/danielfett/draft-dpop On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 5:18 PM Dmitry Telegin wrote: > Agreed on general guidance, will try to draft the text. Should I post it > here first or go straight to GitHub? > > On Wed,

Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP questions (post IETF 115), part 2

2022-11-17 Thread Dmitry Telegin
Thanks Brian, it's clear now. Shame on me for having overlooked that DPoP bit in Sec 3. Dmitry On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:20 PM Brian Campbell wrote: > Hello Dmitry, > > TLDR: yes DPoP and Step-Up can be used together. > > The first sentence in the section of step-up that describes the new

Re: [OAUTH-WG] DPoP questions (post IETF 115), part 1

2022-11-17 Thread Dmitry Telegin
Agreed on general guidance, will try to draft the text. Should I post it here first or go straight to GitHub? On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 1:49 PM Brian Campbell wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 5:18 PM Dmitry Telegin 40backbase@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> >> To sum up, my idea is that in

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15

2022-11-17 Thread Robert Sparks
On 11/17/22 4:44 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: Apologies - an upload fumble left -00 empty. I've revised it to have content at -01. Which I'll also paste here for convenience: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15

2022-11-17 Thread Robert Sparks
Apologies - an upload fumble left -00 empty. I've revised it to have content at -01. RjS On 11/17/22 4:36 PM, Robert Sparks via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team

[OAUTH-WG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-rar-15

2022-11-17 Thread Robert Sparks via Datatracker
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

Re: [OAUTH-WG] [IANA #1261154] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-rar (OAuth Parameters - OAuth Extensions Error)

2022-11-17 Thread Warren Parad
Hello Sabrina, In the future I want to make sure that there is more than one owner for this process. In the past it sometimes was quite a challenge to get timely approvals. Would you be able to point me to the right place to ensure we can extend the ownership? Thanks, Warren On Thu, Nov 17,

[OAUTH-WG] [IANA #1261154] expert review for draft-ietf-oauth-rar (OAuth Parameters - OAuth Extensions Error)

2022-11-17 Thread Sabrina Tanamal via RT
Hi Hannes (cc: oauth wg), As the designated expert for the OAuth Parameters and OAuth Extensions Error registries, can you review the proposed registrations in draft-ietf-oauth-rar for us? Please see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-oauth-rar The due date is December 1st. If

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Tuesday side meeting agenda

2022-11-17 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Hi Kai, These slides are already on the OAuth WG meeting material. I have added the links to the two related presentations: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/materials/slides-115-oauth-fine-grained-transactional-authorization-sgnl-proposal