Re: [OAUTH-WG] Informal RFC: DPoP using ECDH + HMAC instead of DSA

2023-01-04 Thread Zack Voase
Thanks, this is really useful context! There are other places in OAuth where I think more DH could be useful (e.g. removing a network hop from PKCE by replacing the code challenge with an ephemeral public key, and having the authorization server derive a key and then directly return an access

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Informal RFC: DPoP using ECDH + HMAC instead of DSA

2023-01-04 Thread Brian Campbell
Hi Zack, For whatever it's worth, HMAC PoP has been discussed in the past (in a few different incarnations). Neil Madden put forth the idea of a somewhat similar sounding Diffie-Hellman style approach https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/1Zltt75p5taPw0DRmhoKLbavu9s/, which I sort of

[OAUTH-WG] Informal RFC: DPoP using ECDH + HMAC instead of DSA

2023-01-04 Thread Zack Voase
Hi OAuth list, Hopefully this is the right place for this message. I wanted to surface an idea for an alternative DPoP approach to the current one based on digital signatures. I'm looking for feedback to determine whether it's worth investigating further or writing up a proper RFC. Is there