Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-30 Thread Markus
Hi Rifaat, Right now a browser uses either basic , NTLM, Kerberos or Negotiate authentication to a proxy which are all old methods and not anymore appropriate with Microsoft AD moving to Azure AD. Other methods like OAUTH might now be more appropriate assuming enterprises still require

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAUTH for Web Proxy authentication

2023-01-30 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
Hi Markus, As Goerge mentioned, there is no such document that covers this. What use case(s) do you have in mind for this? Regards, Rifaat On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 7:50 PM Markus wrote: > Thank you. > > Regards > Markus > *From:* George Fletcher > *Sent:* Saturday, January 28, 2023 1:43 PM >

Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Protected Resource Metadata

2023-01-30 Thread Rifaat Shekh-Yusef
I added both to the list of topics to discuss in Yokohama. Let's have that discussion first, before calling for any adoption. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 8:35 PM Aaron Parecki wrote: > There is significant overlap between this draft and the concepts brought > to the

[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-oauth-rar-23.txt

2023-01-30 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web Authorization Protocol WG of the IETF. Title : OAuth 2.0 Rich Authorization Requests Authors : Torsten Lodderstedt