Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for adoption: Cross-Device Flows

2022-11-21 Thread Dima Postnikov
+1 for adoption On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 1:43 AM Rifaat Shekh-Yusef wrote: > All, > > During the IETF meeting last week, there was a strong support for > the adoption of the following document as a WG document: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kasselman-cross-device-security/ > > This is

Re: [OAUTH-WG] How to enforce PKCE in authorization servers with a mix OAuth 2.0 and 2.1 clients?

2022-10-08 Thread Dima Postnikov
implement the "REQUIRED or RECOMMENDED" in the > OAuth 2.1 spec for code_challenge. > > Another spec that deals with PKCE is the OAuth BCP, but to me that's not a > optimal place to define a new parameter. > > > Vladimir Dzhuvinov > > > On 08/10/2022 04:31, Dima P

Re: [OAUTH-WG] How to enforce PKCE in authorization servers with a mix OAuth 2.0 and 2.1 clients?

2022-10-07 Thread Dima Postnikov
Hi Vladimir, Similar issue exists in CDR (Australian Open Banking). PAR and PKCE was added as mandatory to FAPI 1 Advanced profile. There was a transition period when AS had to support both (potentially). Also if the same AS is used outside of CDR, this dual support would continue for some

Re: [OAUTH-WG] WGLC for Step-up Authentication

2022-10-07 Thread Dima Postnikov
Couple of quick comments from me: 1) (Editorial) >In simple API authorization scenarios, an authorization server will statically determine what authentication technique In many scenarios, authorization servers will use *dynamic* decisioning to determine authentication techniques; it's just not

Re: [OAUTH-WG] third party applications

2020-09-02 Thread Dima Postnikov
I agree, "limited access" makes sense. I am happy to create a PR, if required. Current wording is: The OAuth 2.1 authorization framework enables a*n* *third-party* application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval

Re: [OAUTH-WG] third party applications

2020-09-01 Thread Dima Postnikov
ification on this and would only confuse people >> further. Any clarifications of which situations are appropriate for using >> OAuth could be explored in a different section in the spec. >> >> Aaron Parecki >> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 3:02 AM Torsten Loddersted

Re: [OAUTH-WG] third party applications

2020-09-01 Thread Dima Postnikov
ppropriate for using > OAuth could be explored in a different section in the spec. > > Aaron Parecki > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 3:02 AM Torsten Lodderstedt 40lodderstedt@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > >> I agree. OAuth works for 3rd as well as 1st parties as well. >>

[OAUTH-WG] third party applications

2020-08-27 Thread Dima Postnikov
Hi, Can "third-party" term be removed from the specification? The standard and associated best practices apply to other applications that act on behalf of a resource owner, too (internal, "first-party" and etc). Regards, Dima The OAuth 2.1 authorization framework enables a *third-party*